Medical device regulation: reasonable, workable
Peter Barton Hutt, Harold O. Buzzell, Robert S. Kennedy, University of Rochester. Center for the Study of Drug Development
Center for the Study of Drug Development, Dept. of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Rochester Medical Center, 1982 - Medical - 8 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
1976 Amendments agency agency's ance standards Bureau of Medical cervical caps Class II devices Class III classification clinical studies conduct the investigation Congress Cooper Committee COOPERATION AND CONFLICT device industry device involves device manufacturer device regulations devices first marketed Drug Administration enactment ensure estab established FDA regulate Federal Food final regulations Food and Drug gations HIMA IDE regulation implement included informed consent institutional review boards intrauterine devices investigational plan INVESTIGATIONS WITH MEDICAL involved in clinical IRBs indicates institutional lished mandatory Mandatory labeling manufacturing practices Medical Device Amendments Medical Device Investigations ments nonsignificant risk device patient potential for serious premarket approval applications prior investigations procedure promulgated proposal protocol quirements regulation merely regulatory control report of prior require restricted devices RULES Robert safety and effectiveness serious risk significant risk device Silver Spring Sponsors and IRBs substantially equivalent tial tion ucts University of Rochester vices waiver