Memorandum of the Federal court decision concerning constitutionality of professional standards review legislation: printed for the use of the Committee on Finance, United States Senate
United States. District Court (Illinois : Northern District : Eastern Division), United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Finance
U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1975 - Law - 18 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
_ I _ 42 U.S.C. Section arbitrary or invidious argument Bolton civil liability Congress Court ﬁnds Court notes Court of Appeals criminal abortion statutes doctor of medicine Due Process Clause economical manner Federal Government Fifth Amendment ﬁrst ﬂexibility health care facility health care services hospital I I _ invalidated invidious discrimination lacking in rational legislation unconstitutionally limitations of liability Medicaid Programs medical utilization review medically necessary medicare and medicaid norms overbroad overutilization patients physician Plaintiffs argue practice their profession practitioner or provider privacy of plaintiffs private organizations procedural due process Professional Standards Review providers of health PSRO PSRO’s real and immediate regulation require right of privacy right to practice services and items speciﬁc Standards Review Organization statutory scheme summary judgment supra Supreme Court threat of injury tion Title 42 uncon unconstitutional unconstitutionally interfere United States Code United States Constitution vague