Memory and Law
Lynn Nadel, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong
OUP USA, Aug 2, 2012 - Law - 398 pages
The legal system depends upon memory function in a number of critical ways, including the memories of victims, the memories of individuals who witness crimes or other critical events, the memories of investigators, lawyers, and judges engaged in the legal process, and the memories of jurors. How well memory works, how accurate it is, how it is affected by various aspects of the criminal justice system — these are all important questions. But there are others as well: Can we tell when someone is reporting an accurate memory? Can we distinguish a true memory from a false one? Can memories be selectively enhanced, or erased? Are memories altered by emotion, by stress, by drugs? These questions and more are addressed by Memory and Law, which aims to present the current state of knowledge among cognitive and neural scientists about memory as applied to the law.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
accurate amygdala antidevice Applied Cognitive Psychology Ben-Shakhar beneﬁts biased blackjack brain activity card counting Cognitive Neuroscience concealed information conﬁdence and accuracy conﬁdence judgments conﬁdence rating correlation cortex countermeasures courts crime criminal Davachi deception decision detection effects emotional encoding event-related potential experience experimental eye movements eyewitness identiﬁcation eyewitness testimony false memories false recognition feedback ﬁeld ﬁnal ﬁnd ﬁndings ﬁrst ﬁve fMRI guilty high conﬁdence hippocampus Hirst Human Behavior inadmissible evidence inﬂuence innocent suspect instructions to disregard irrelevant jurors jury Law and Human lie detection Lindsay lineup member Loftus Memon metacognitive metamemory misinformation effect neural neuroimaging neuroscience ofthe paradigm participants perpetrator potential prefrontal prefrontal cortex presented probe processes Psychological Science Psychophysiology PTSD question recall recollections reﬂect relevant remembering reported response retrieval Roediger Rosenfeld scenes Schacter scientiﬁc sequential lineup signiﬁcant social speciﬁc stimuli studies subjects suggests target tion validity verdicts Verschuere witness