Metropolitan Governance and Spatial Planning: Comparative Case Studies of European City-regions

Front Cover
W. G. M. Salet, Andy Thornley, Anton Kreukels
Taylor & Francis, 2003 - Architecture - 406 pages
Metropolitan Governance and Spatial Planning explores the relationship between metropolitan decision-making and strategies to co-ordinate spatial policy. This relationship is examined across 20 cities of Europe and the similarities and differences analysed.
Cities are having to formulate their urban policies in a very complex and turbulent environment. They are faced with numerous new pressures and problems and these often create contradictory conditions. The book provides a theoretical framework for exploring these issues and links this to a detailed investigation of each city.

In the context of globalisation, cities in the last twenty years have experienced new patterns of activity and these usually transcend political boundaries. The management of these changes therefore requires an effort of co-ordination and different cities have found different approaches.
However the institutional setting itself has not remained static. The nation states in Europe have handed over many responsibilities to the European Union while also increasing devolution to regions and cities. Government has therefore become a more complex multi-level activity.
There has also been the move from government to governance. Many different public, quasi-public and private bodies are now involved in making decisions that affect urban development. Metropolitan governance is therefore also a complex multi-actor process.
In these conditions of fragmented governance and the widening spatial networking of urban development, the issue of policy co-ordination become ever more important. The exploration of the 20 cities shows that many face similar difficulties while some also provide interesting examples of innovative practice. The book concludes that the way forward is to find strategies to link the different spheres of metropolitan action through 'organising connectivity'.
 

Selected pages

Contents

Contributors
ix
Preface
xiii
1 Institutional and spatial
3
2
20
3 London
41
4
57
5
77
6 The Stockholm region
91
Table 132 continued
218
14 Metropolitan governance
230
Table 141 The main planning periods since 1857
232
15 Venice
244
Figure 151 Venice and its metropolitan region
245
Table 152 Commuters flows within the Venice metropolitan area
249
Table 153 Employment in the Venice area by position
250
Table 156 Medium prices for dwelling in different types of
253

Uppsala
96
7 Berlin
113
8 The Frankfurt RhineMain
125
9 The Hanover metropolitan
145
10 Governance in the
163
11 Amsterdam and the north
175
12 Rotterdam and the south
189
North Wing
190
13 The Prague metropolitan
205
Table 131 Summary of major urban issues in
212
Side effects of
213
16 The region of Milan
264
17 Paris ÎledeFrance
287
18 Brussels
301
1000m
317
19 MarseillesAix
320
20 The case of Barcelona
337
Housing units per 1000
344
1999
346
21 Metropolitan government
359
22 Practices of metropolitan
377
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2003)

Andy Thornley is Director of Planning Studies at the London School of Economics and Political Science.Anton Kreukels.>

Bibliographic information