Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge and Recreaton Area: A Case Study
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
INTERVIEW RESULTS ANDSUMMARY
2 other sections not shown
94th Congress acres active Agricultural bill Bloomington Natural Resources bluffs Bridge crossing provisions Brochure Burnsville and Savage Burnsville Environmental Council Carver State Park Chaska Cities metropolitan area citizen group College of Forestry commercial and industrial concern created the Minnesota Dakota and Ojibway Department of Natural early Eden Prairie establishment factors favorable Federal felt Fish and Wildlife flood floodplain government officials habitat historical idea included indicated industrial development interest involved Lake Agassiz landfills legislation lower Minnesota River Minneaglis Tribune Minneapolis Minnesota River valley Minnesota Valley National Mississippi Mississippi River National Wildlife Refuge Olson opinions Paul politicians portion protect the natural protection effort public support question recreation area Recreational Trails refuge and recreation refuge project Research responses River Recreation Scott County seen a copy Shakopee Sioux sore sub—groups Theodore Wirth Twin Cities metropolitan U.S. Fish U.S. Senate Valley National Wildlife Valleyfair Wayside wildlife refuge proposal Wildlife Service