讀者評論 - 撰寫評論
其他版本 - 查看全部
Abolitionists Adams administration admission adopted amendment American annexation Anti-Slavery appointed ballot Bank Benton bill Britain British Buchanan Buren Cabinet Calhoun called candidate charged citizens Clay commerce Committee Congress Constitution Convention declared Democracy Democratic party deposits doctrine Douglas duties effect election Executive favor Federal Federalists Fillmore France friends Georgia Government Governor Jackson James Buchanan Jefferson John Quincy Adams Kansas Lecompton Constitution Legislature letter majority measure ment Message Mexico Minister Missouri Missouri Compromise nation Nays negotiation nominated North Northern object opponents opposed opposition peace petition political ports present President President's principle proclamation prohibited protection question reader Rebellion received refused repeal reported Republican resolution revenue secession Secretary Senate session Slave Power slaveholders Slavery South Carolina Southern specie circular speech Supreme Court tariff territory Texas tion Treasury treaty Union United vessels veto Virginia Whig Whig party Wilmot Proviso Yeas York
第 233 頁 - And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are of the gift of God?
第 73 頁 - The recent demonstration of public sentiment inscribes on the list of Executive duties, in characters too legible to be overlooked, the task of reform, which will require particularly the correction of those abuses that have brought the patronage of the Federal Government into conflict with the freedom of elections, and the counteraction of those causes which have disturbed the rightful course of appointment and have placed or continued power in unfaithful or incompetent hands.
第 115 頁 - ... declare war against the other, on complaints of injuries or damages until the said party considering itself offended, shall...
第 230 頁 - ... that on the first day of january in the year of our lord one thousand eight hundred and sixtythree all persons held as slaves within any state or designated part of a state the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the united states shall be then thenceforward and forever free...
第 176 頁 - March 6, 1820,) which, being inconsistent with the principle of non-intervention by Congress with slavery in the States and Territories — as recognized by the legislation of 1850, commonly called the Compromise Measures — is hereby declared inoperative and void; it being the true intent and meaning of this act not to legislate slavery into any Territory or State, nor to exclude it therefrom, but to leave the people thereof perfectly free to form and regulate their domestic institutions in their...
第 219 頁 - It follows from these views that no state, upon its own mere motion, can lawfully get out of the Union; that resolves and ordinances to that effect are legally void; and that acts of violence within any state or states against the authority of the United States are insurrectionary or revolutionary, according to circumstances.
第 187 頁 - They had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations, and so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the Negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit.
第 16 頁 - That a national government ought to be established, consisting of a supreme legislative, executive, and judiciary.
第 223 頁 - The whole of the laws which were required to be faithfully executed were being resisted and failing of execution in nearly one-third of the States. Must they be allowed to finally fail of execution, even had it been perfectly clear that by the use of the means necessary to their execution some single law, made in such extreme tenderness of the citizen's liberty that practically it relieves more of the guilty than of the innocent, should to a very limited extent be violated! To state the question...