Mitigation and Aggravation at Sentencing
Julian V. Roberts
Cambridge University Press, Aug 25, 2011 - Law
This innovative volume explores a fundamental issue in the field of sentencing: the factors which make a sentence more or less severe. All sentencing systems allow courts discretion to consider mitigating and aggravating factors, and many legislatures have placed a number of such factors on a statutory footing. Yet many questions remain regarding the theory and practice of mitigation and aggravation. Drawing on legal and sociological perspectives and examining mitigation and aggravation in various jurisdictions, the essays provide practical illustrations of specific factors as well as theoretical justifications. After the foreword by Andrew von Hirsch, a number of contributors address broad conceptual issues raised at sentencing. These contributions are followed by several empirical chapters including an exploration of personal mitigation in English courts. The authors are leading scholars from a range of common law jurisdictions including England and Wales, the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Chapter two ReEvaluating the Justifications for Aggravation and Mitigation at Sentencing
Integrating Cultural Demands
Chapter Four Personal Mitigation and Assumptions about Offending and Desistance
Mitigation or Aggravation?
Australasian Approaches to Provocation as a Sentencing Factor
Racial and social background factors as sources of mitigation at sentencing
An Empirical Analysis in England and Wales
Chapter Nine Exploring Public Attitudes to Sentencing Factors in England and Wales
Findings from an Empirical Study of the Publics Approach to Personal Mitigation
Chapter Eleven Addressing Problematic Sentencing Factors in the Development of Guidelines
Chapter Twelve Proof of Aggravating and Mitigating Facts at Sentencing
Chapter Thirteen Mitigation in Federal Sentencing in the United States
A South African case study
Other editions - View all
Aboriginal offenders aggravating and mitigating aggravating factors aggravating or mitigating alcohol American Law Institute apply approach argued assault Australia available at www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk band choice factors chapter circumstances community order consider Court of Appeal criminal history Criminal Justice Act Criminal Law Criminology Crown Court culture custody defendant defendant’s desistance deterrence disadvantage draft guideline drug England and Wales example facts Freiberg guidance guilty plea harm homicide impact imposed imprisonment indigenous intoxication issue Jacobson and Hough jurisdictions justify Law Commission mandatory sentence manslaughter Mike Hough mitigating and aggravating mitigating factors murder offender’s culpability partial defence penal personal mitigation prison Prison Reform Trust proportionality theory provocation public opinion punishment purposes of sentencing reasons reduced rehabilitation relevant remorse reparation response restorative justice role Sentencing Advisory Panel Sentencing Council sentencing decisions sentencing factors Sentencing Guidelines Council sentencing judge sentencing law sentencing practice sentencing process Shapland social statutory tencing tion victim VLRC