Negotiation as corporate skill
Seminar paper from the year 1999 in the subject Business economics - Marketing, Corporate Communication, CRM, Market Research, Social Media, grade: A, University of West Florida, Pensacola, course: Professional Selling, language: English, abstract: Today, in the age of networking, strategic alliances and joint-ventures, the ability of companies and other institutions to negotiate successful deals is becoming evermore important. Every company today exists in a complex network of relationships formed through negotiation. Whether negotiating with suppliers, customers or strategic business partners, taken together, the thousands of negotiations a typical company engages in have an enormous effect on both its strategy and its bottom line. But few companies think systematically about their negotiating activities as a whole. Moreover, negotiation is still largely considered to be an individual rather than corporate skill. The concept of negotiation as a skill manifests itself in training programs directed at sales personnel rather than in a company′s corporate philosophies. Few companies seem to have tried to turn their negotiation skills into a core competency with the objective of building more rewarding customers relationships. The aim is thus to shift from a situational to an institutional view of negotiation. This requires changes in practice, focus and communication of negotiations. The key is to develop a "negotiation infrastructure" and incorporate it into an organization′s strategy and philosophy. Using the BATNA approach gives salespeople a new source of power in their negotiations. Broadening the measures to judge salespeople′s performance allows them greater freedom to build agreements. However, there is a potential threat to this new approach is that it might turn into another set of rules that are followed without the necessary changes in perspective and behavior. The bottom line is that salespeople have to develop the ability to create strong, lasting, mutually beneficial agreements that meet the needs of all parties in a negotiation and build a negotiation relationship for the future. To this end, the personalities of all the participants and their group objectives and self objectives, which might not be the same, must be recognized. A positive negotiating environment that is based on trust and mutual respect should be developed. This attitude is conducive to reaching mutually acceptable compromises during negotiations.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
ability alternative for closing approach to negotiation Available BATNA approach behavior Best Alternative best interest bottom line Broadening the measures build agreements building more rewarding buyers chances changes clear distinction client close the deal closing a deal collaborative communication company’s concessions consider coordinated corporate skill correlate create Creative cycle develop discount draw a clear elements end up giving Ertel points evaluate focus focusing give salespeople goal Gottlieb ground rules http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe 1999 identified important improve individual Interest-based negotiations invest judged long-term measures of success mutually beneficial needs Negotiated Agreement negotiating activities negotiating parties negotiation capabilities negotiation infrastructure negotiation is unique Negotiation Skills Company Negotiation strategies negotiator’s notion objective October 27 one’s outcome overcome participants party’s past negotiations price cut problem problem-solvers reason rewarding customer relationships rules of negotiation sales personnel satisfying sellers separate event Shea Spilka strong relationship Stumm suppliers tactic trade-offs Turning negotiation unto