Neural Theories of Mind: Why the Mind-Brain Problem May Never Be Solved
In this fascinating book, William R. Uttal raises the possibility that, however much we learn about the anatomy and physiology of the brain and psychology, we may never be able to cross the final bridge explaining how the mind is produced by the brain. Three main classes of mind-brain theory are considered and rejected: field theories, because they are based on a superficial analogy; single cell theories, because they emerge from a massive uncontrolled experimental program; and neural net theories, because they are constrained by combinatorial complexity.
To support his argument, Uttal explores the empirical and conceptual foundations of these theoretical approaches and identifies flaws in their fundamental logic. The author concludes that the problems preventing solution of the mind-brain problem are intractable, yet well within the confines of natural science.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Neural Theories of Mind: Why the Mind-brain Problem May Never be Solved
William R. Uttal
No preview available - 2005
accepted activity actually analysis answer approach argued argument associated assumptions become behavior body brain cells century changes chapter classic cognitive neuroscience cognitive processes complex components concept concerning consciousness considered continuous correlation described determined discussion distributed effect emerged empirical equivalent example exist experience explanation expressed fact field field theories function fundamental Greek human idea important individual influence interactions interesting issue kind later learning limits logical mathematical matter means measure mechanisms mental methods mind nature nervous system neural network Neuron Doctrine observed original particular pattern perception philosophers physical possible present principle problem produce properties proposed psychological quantum question reasons relationships remains represent response result role scientific seems signals simple simulated single neuron solve specific stimulus structure studies suggested theoretical theory thinking thought types understanding units University visual