No Holding Back: The 1980 John B. Anderson Presidential Campaign

Front Cover
University Press of America, 2011 - Political Science - 563 pages
No Holding Back tells the story of John Anderson's 1980 presidential campaign. Anderson gave up a safe seat in the House of Representatives, a position in the Republican leadership, and a likely nomination for a Senate seat to run what every expert considered a hopeless race for the GOP presidential nomination. Anderson did so because he was disturbed by many of the same trends in American politics that still exist today: the proliferation of special interests, gridlock on Capitol Hill, and the unwillingness of his fellow politicians to speak honestly about the critical issues facing the nation. More than anything, Anderson wanted to make a statement about how candidates ought to run for office: by rejecting quick-fix solutions, being candid on where one stood on matters of policy, and not sugarcoating the problems that faced voters. Anderson ran as a kind of anti-candidate. He had a unique campaigning style and offered proposals that differed greatly from the standard Republican viewpoint. People found him refreshingly direct and different. As interest turned to the campaign, he attracted widespread media attention. He performed beyond expectations in the first round of primaries and soon switched to an independent candidacy. By June, he was running at 26% in a three-way race against Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan. Against the backdrop of runaway inflation, the Iranian hostage situation, a debilitating energy crisis, and a discredited incumbent president, pollsters found him winning unprecedented support. But during the summer, troubled by ballot access problems, financial issues, institutional obstacles, and management difficulties, Anderson's polling totals began to fall. Once it became clear that he would not win, his support collapsed and he limped to a 7% finish. This final result has greatly undermined the importance of this campaign. It has influenced numerous future candidates and changed the way many politicians would run for office. His was the first candidacy to expose how

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.


A Different Approach
1901 to March 1978 Feelings of Isolation and Frustration
from January 1977 to December 1979 A Good and WellIntentioned ManWho Was in Over His Head
A Kind of an AntiCandidate
An Untraditional Message
Out of Left Field
A Bright New Force in American Politics
A CoEqual Third Contender
Too Careful Too Concerned with Winning Too Conventional
Delusions and False Hopes
A Path Fraught with Obstacles
Anderson Campaign Timeline

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2011)

Jim Mason majored in political science at the University of Pennsylvania. He has worked at George Washington University, the University of Rhode Island, and St. Mary's College of Maryland. He grew up in Maplewood, New Jersey, and splits his time between New York City and Becket, Massachusetts.

Bibliographic information