No future: queer theory and the death drive
In this searing polemic, Lee Edelman outlines a radically uncompromising new ethics of queer theory. His main target is the all-pervasive figure of the child, which he reads as the linchpin of our universal politics of "reproductive futurism." Edelman argues that the child, understood as innocence in need of protection, represents the possibility of the future against which the queer is positioned as the embodiment of a relentlessly narcissistic, antisocial, and future-negating drive. He boldly insists that the efficacy of queerness lies in its very willingness to embrace this refusal of the social and political order. InNo Future, Edelman urges queers to abandon the stance of accommodation and accede to their status as figures for the force of a negativity that he links with irony,jouissance, and, ultimately, the death drive itself.Closely engaging with literary texts, Edelman makes a compelling case for imagining Scrooge without Tiny Tim and Silas Marner without little Eppie. Looking to Alfred Hitchcockrs"s films, he embraces two of the directorrs"s most notorious creations: the sadistic Leonard ofNorth by Northwest, who steps on the hand that holds the couple precariously above the abyss, and the terrifying title figures ofThe Birds, with their predilection for children. Edelman enlarges the reach of contemporary psychoanalytic theory as he brings it to bear not only on works of literature and film but also on such current political flashpoints as gay marriage and gay parenting. Throwing down the theoretical gauntlet,No Futurereimagines queerness with a passion certain to spark an equally impassioned debate among its readers.
What people are saying - Write a review
No future: queer theory and the death driveUser Review - Not Available - Book Verdict
Queer theory, a fairly recent academic discipline, has been commonly used as an analytic tool to deconstruct literature, film and art, although writers such as Judith Butler and Michael Warner have ... Read full review
2 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
access to jouissance affirm Alfred Hitchcock allegorize Antigone Baudrillard birds Bodega Bay Butler calls catachresis Cathy Child cited parenthetically coming compassion Copjec culture death drive desire dialectic discourse embodiment enact enjoyment Ethics face fantasy fatality figure film force Freud fuck futurism's heteronormativity heterosexual Hitchcock's homosexuality human identity ideology Imaginary insistence insofar irony Jacques Lacan jouissance Lacanian Lee Edelman Leonard logic lovebirds meaning meaningless Melanie Melanie's narcissism narcissistic narrative nature negation negativity never North by Northwest object political Popeye Popeye's precisely Psychoanalysis queer sexualities Queer Theory radical Real reality realization refuses relation repetition reproductive futurism resistance Rhetoric scene Scrooge Seminar sequence sexual difference sexual rapport signifier Silas Marner sinthome sinthomosexual sinthomosexual's social order structure survival Symbolic order temporal thereby Thornhill Thornhill's threat Tiny tion tive trans turn undoing University Press words York