No law: intellectual property in the image of an absolute First Amendment
The original text of the Constitution grants Congress the power to create a regime of intellectual property protection. The first amendment, however, prohibits Congress from enacting any law that abridges the freedoms of speech and of the press. While many have long noted the tension between these provisions, recent legal and cultural developments have transformed mere tension into conflict. No Law offers a new way to approach these debates.
In eloquent and passionate style, Lange and Powell argue that the First Amendment imposes absolute limits upon claims of exclusivity in intellectual property and expression, and strips Congress of the power to restrict personal thought and free expression in the name of intellectual property rights. Though the First Amendment does not repeal the Constitutional intellectual property clause in its entirety, copyright, patent, and trademark law cannot constitutionally license the private commodification of the public domain.
The authors claim that while the exclusive rights currently reflected in intellectual property are not in truth needed to encourage intellectual productivity, they develop a compelling solution for how Congress, even within the limits imposed by an absolute First Amendment, can still regulate incentives for intellectual creations. Those interested in the impact copyright doctrines have on freedom of expression in the U.S. and the theoretical and practical aspects of intellectual property law will want to take a closer look at this bracing, resonant work.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Unfair Competition and Trademarks
Patents Copyright and Neighboring Rights
Exclusive Rights and the Constitution
7 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
No Law: Intellectual Property in the Image of an Absolute First Amendment
David Lange,H. Jefferson Powell
No preview available - 2008
abridge absolute First Amendment Amendment's American appropriation argued argument authority Bill of Rights Blackstone Blackstone's Brandeis claim Columbia Law Review common law compulsory licenses Congress constitutional copy copyright and patent copyright clause copyright law creative David Lange decision discussion dissenting Eldred Eleventh Amendment exclusive rights fact fair federal Federalists Fourteenth Amendment free expression free speech freedom of expression freedom of speech governmental Harvard Law Review Holmes Holmes's Ibid idea incentives individual industry infringement intellectual property clause interests interpretation issue Jed Rubenfeld judicial Justice Black Law Journal Law Review legislation liberty limited matter meaning ment misappropriation monopoly moral rights Nimmer on Copyright opinion original patent law press clauses prior restraints productivity Professor proprietors provision Public Domain question recognized role Rubenfeld Sedition Act Seminole Tribe speech and press Supreme Court thought tion trade secret understanding unfair competition University Press York