No magic wand: the idealization of science in law

Front Cover
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Aug 28, 2006 - Law - 153 pages
0 Reviews
Since 1993, Supreme Court precedent has asked judges to serve as gatekeepers to their expert witnesses, admitting only reliable scientific testimony. Lacking a strong background in science, however, some judges admit dubious scientific testimony packages by articulate practitioners, while others reject reliable evidence that is unreasonably portrayed as full of holes. Seeking a balance between undue deference and undeserved skepticism, Caudill and LaRue draw on the philosophy of science to help judges, juries, and advocates better understand its goals and limitations.

From inside the book

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.


On Judges Who Are Too Strict
On Judges Who Are Too Gullible
The Idealizations of Legal Scholars

3 other sections not shown

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Bibliographic information