No state shall abridge: the 14th amendment and the Bill of Rights

Front Cover
Duke University Press, Jul 1, 1986 - Law - 275 pages
1 Review
“The book is carefully organized and well written, and it deals with a question that is still of great importance—what is the relationship of the Bill of Rights to the states.”—Journal of American History

“Curtis effectively settles a serious legal debate: whether the framers of the 14th Amendment intended to incorporate the Bill of Rights guarantees and thereby inhibit state action. Taking on a formidable array of constitutional scholars, . . . he rebuts their argument with vigor and effectiveness, conclusively demonstrating the legitimacy of the incorporation thesis. . . . A bold, forcefully argued, important study.”—Library Journal

From inside the book

What people are saying - Write a review

No state shall abridge: the fourteenth amendment and the Bill of Rights

User Review  - Not Available - Book Verdict

Curtis effectively settles a serious legal debate: whether the framers of the 14th Amendment intended to incorporate the Bill of Rights guarantees and thereby inhibit state action. Taking on a ... Read full review

LibraryThing Review

User Review  - DromJohn - LibraryThing

Effective deBorking of Fourteenth Amendment interpretation. Read full review

Contents

From the Revolution to the Bill of Rights
18
The Framing of the Fourteenth Amendment
57
In Which Some Historical Arguments Against
70
Copyright

4 other sections not shown

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (1986)

\

Michael Kent Curtis is Professor of Law at Wake Forest University School of Law.

Bibliographic information