Not a Particularly Different Voice: The Jurisprudence of Sandra Day O'Connor
As the leading voice of conservative pragmatism on the Supreme Court, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor has surprised both liberals and conservatives by crafting new approaches to several areas of American constitutional law. Much of the prior work examining Justice O'Connor's Supreme Court record has tried in vain to demonstrate that she stakes out legal positions based on her gender. In this comprehensive and systematic study, Robert W. Van Sickel explores the full corpus of O'Connor's opinions, as well as her various speeches, articles, and work on the Arizona Court of Appeals. He identifies a set of flexible yet consistent values that pervade her decisions during the past fifteen years.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Introduction and Research Framework
Justice OConnors Career Prior to Her United
Justice OConnors General Approach to Legal
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
abortion administrative affirmative action agenda American analysis approach argued Arizona asserted basic Behuniak-Long belief Binion Burger Chief Justice civil rights claims Clause concerns conclusions confirmation hearings Congress conservative consistent Constitutional Law decisionmaking decisions deference discrimination discussed dissenting doctrine Establishment Clause federal courts federal law feminine voice feminist jurisprudence free exercise gender goal governmental habeas corpus Ibid important infra instance interest involved issues judicial behavior judicial restraint Judiciary Justice O'Connor Justice Rehnquist Justice Sandra Day justice's Law Review legal areas legislative Lewis Powell majority opinion marginalist note 15 supra O'Connor's judicial O'Connor's jurisprudence O'Connor's opinion O'Connor's views offer perspective political precedent procedural public policy question Reagan regard regulation Republican role ruling Sandra Day O'Connor scholars Segal and Spaeth Senate Sherry Sherry's simply social statute statutory interpretation Supreme Court justice Suzanna Sherry Tenth Amendment U.S. Supreme Court voting Warren Burger William Rehnquist woman