Obscenity and Indecency: Constitutional Principles and Federal Statutes
Obscenity is not protected by the First Amendment and therefore may be banned. Other pornography or indecency may be regulated to serve compelling government interest provided that the least restrictive means available is used. Contents: Summary; Constitutional Principles; Federal Obscenity and Indecency Statues; Cable Television; The Communications Decency Act of 1996; Child Online Protection Act; Child Internet Protection Act; RICO; Wiretaps; The Customs Service Provision; Index.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
A The Miller Test
B Zoning and Licensing of Pornography Dealers
C Nude Dancing
Federal Obscenity and Indecency Statutes
C Obscenity Provisions at 18 USC 14601470
D Cable Television
adult affirmed Amendment protection American Civil Liberties American Library Association applies blocking or filtering broadcast cable television Child Online Protection child pornography CIPA Civil Liberties Union Communications Decency Act compelling interest Congress constitutional contemporary community standards conviction COPA COPA's court found Court noted court of appeals crime knowingly criminal define dial-a-porn enacted enforcement Federal Communications Commission federal statutes foreign commerce forfeiture fully scramble governmental interest harmful to minors interactive computer service interest in protecting Internet access interstate or foreign Justice Souter least restrictive means less restrictive alternative libraries Miller test narrowly tailored nude dancing obscene material Obscenity and Indecency Online Protection Act ordinance patently offensive patrons person plaintiffs predicate offenses programming prohibit prosecution provides prurient interest public nudity regulate Reno RICO secondary effects sexually oriented sexually oriented business strict scrutiny supra note theaters Third Circuit U.S. Code United upheld violations visual depictions wrote