Obscenity prosecution and the Constitution: hearing before the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Property Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Ninth Congress, first session, March 16, 2005, Volume 4
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Brownback Hon Sam a U S Senator from the State of Kansas
Feingold Hon Russell D a U S Senator from the State of Wisconsin
Schauer Frederick Frank Stanton Professor of the First Amendment John
2 other sections not shown
addiction Attorney General's Commission California CEOS Chairman Brownback Child Exploitation child pornography child pornography prosecutions Commission on Pornography Committee community standards compelling state interest Congress consenting adults constitutional law convictions Department of Justice Destro Obscenity Prosecution distributors of obscenity endorsing Enforcing Obscenity Laws existing Exploitation and Obscenity Extreme Associates federal obscenity statutes Feingold films Fourteenth Amendments Frederick Schauer hard-core hardcore pornography hearing human trafficking illegal Internet issue Judge Lancaster Judge Lancaster's opinion Judicial Activism juries Justice Department Larry Flynt law enforcement law of obscenity Law Review legally obscene Meese Miller test obscenity crimes Patrick Trueman porn pornography addiction possession of obscenity Prepared Statement Professor Schauer prosecutors prostitution regulation Reidel Reuben Sturman right to privacy Roth S.Ct Senate sexual violence sexually explicit material Stanley Statement of Robert Subcommittee substantive due process Supreme Court Thank Thirty-Seven Photographs Trueman U.S. Attorneys underlying conduct United vigorously prosecute violence against women