On Taqlid: Ibn Al Qayyim's Critique of Authority in Islamic Law
Abdul-Rahman Mustafa offers a deft new translation of a large extract from the book I'lam al Muwaqqi'in 'An Rabb al 'Alamin, by the thirteenth-century Islamic scholar, Ibn Qayyim al Jawziyya. The I'lam comprises an extensive discussion of the subject of taqlid, or legal imitation. It is one of the most comprehensive treatments of Islamic legal theory and even today serves as a manual for mujtahids and muftis. In the portion of the I'lam Mustafa has translated, Ibn Qayyim introduces the nature of taqlid and divides it into several categories. He then provides an account of a debate between a critic of the view that taqlid of a particular school or a scholar is a religious duty and this critic's interlocutor. Among the topics discussed are the different kinds of taqlid, the differences between taqlid and ittibi', the infallibility of religious scholars, the grounds on which one legal opinion might be preferred over another, and whether or not laymen can be expected to perform ijtihad. Ibn Qayyim's legal theory is a formidable reformulation of traditionalist Hanbalism, a legal-theological tradition that has always maintained a distinctive character in Islamic history and that is now growing more influential due to modern interest in the Wahhabi movement and in Ibn Taymiyya, whose legal and theological thought was edited and refined by his student, Ibn Qayyim. In his introduction to the translation, Mustafa critically reviews the scholarship on taqlid and outlines Ibn Qayyim's legal theory and the importance of taqlid within it. Taqlid continues to generate controversy amongst educated Muslims and particularly academics, as Salafi interpretations of Islam, which are generally 'anti-taqlid,' come into conflict with the generally 'pro-taqlid' stance of traditional schools such as the Hanafis. Mustafa's translation of a classic account of Islamic legal theory and strong critique of the dominant legal culture are timely contributions to an increasingly heated debate.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
abandon Abd al-Razzaq Abdallah Abﬁ Abﬂ Abu Bakr Abu Da’ud accept according ackson adopt ahl al-ra’y Ahmad al-Bayhaqi Al-Bukhari al-jami al-Rahman al-San‘ani al-Shaﬁ‘i argue argument Ash‘ari authentic authority Beirut caliph claim commanded condemned Deobandi disagreement evidence fatawa ﬁnd ﬁrst follow God’s hadith Hanafi Hanbali I‘lam Ibn Abbas Ibn Abd al-Barr Ibn Abi Shaybah Ibn Abidin Ibn al-Qayyim Ibn Hazm Ibn Mas‘ud Ibn Taymiyyah ijtihad Imams imitation Islamic Law issue verdicts jurisprudential jurists Kitab knowledge madhhab Malik Messenger MH says Mu‘adh Muftis Muhammad mujtahid muqallid Musannaf Muslim Musnad narration obligation obligatory one’s opinions opposed peace and blessings permissible person prayer principal prohibited proof qiyas Qur’an Qur’an and Sunnah refer regarding regime of taqlid rejected relied religion renowned rigid taqlid rnadhhab rnujtahid rnuqallid scholars rulings Sa‘id Sahib Sahih scripture Shaﬁ‘i signiﬁcance someone speciﬁc statement Successors Suﬁ Sunnah taqlid theological tion traditionalists truth Umar Uthman Zayd