Originalism: A Quarter-Century of Debate
Steven G. Calabresi
Simon and Schuster, Aug 21, 2007 - Political Science - 360 pages
What did the Constitution mean at the time it was adopted? How should we interpret today the words used by the Founding Fathers? In ORIGINALISM: A QUARTER-CENTURY OF DEBATE, these questions are explained and dissected by the very people who continue to shape the legal structure of our country.This is a lively and fascinating discussion of an issue that has occupied the greatest legal minds in America, and one that continues to elicit strong reactions from both those who support and those who oppose the rule of law. Steven G. Calabresi, co-founder of the Federalist Society and professor of law at Northwestern University School of Law, has compiled an impressive collection of speeches, panel discussions, and debates from some of the greatest and most prominent legal experts of the last twenty-five years.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
activist Akhil Amar American answer argued argument believe Bill of Rights Bork branches Cass Sunstein Chief Justice claim Congress Consti constitutional interpretation constitutional law constitutional provisions constitutional text constitutionality David Strauss DEAN KRAMER debate decided decisions defend democracy democratic doctrine document Dred Scott due process enacted enforce entrenchments enumerated powers federal Federalist Society follow precedent Fourteenth Amendment Framers fundamental going GRAGLIA human dignity issue Judge McConnell judicial restraint judiciary jurisprudence Justice Scalia Law Review legislative legislature liberty limited Lino Graglia Madison Meese Meese’s ment Necessary and Proper Ninth Amendment opinion original intention original meaning original understanding originalist overruled Paulsen political pragmatic President principles problem PROFESSOR CALABRESI Professor Sunstein Proper Clause protect question Randy Randy Barnett ratified Reagan reason rule of law speech spending power stare decisis statute Supreme Court things tion tution unconstitutional unenumerated rights vote words written Constitution