Oversight hearing to review the findings of the Commercial Activities Panel: hearing before the Subcommittee on Technology and Procurement Policy of the Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives, One Hundred Seventh Congress, second session, September 27, 2002
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
A-76 best value A-76 competitions accountability Administration's AFGE arbitrary best value process bidder Bush Administration CAP report changes Commercial Activities Panel compete competitive sourcing Comptroller conflict of interest Congress considered consistently applied process contractor workforce cost comparison current A-76 process Defense Department of Defense efficient ensure evaluation factors fair FAR-based best value FAR-based process Federal Acquisition Regulation federal employee jobs federal government full-time equivalent goals government's high-performing human capital crisis implementation important improve in-house inherently governmental issues Johnson Controls mission offerors OMB Circular A-76 opportunity outsourcing quotas Panel members panel's pro-contractor faction Panel's recommendations Panel's report panelists percent performed by federal Pete Aldridge private sector privatization quotas Procurement Policy proposal protests public sector public-private competition process representatives sourcing decisions sourcing policy Stephen Goldsmith taxpayers Technology and Procurement Thank TRAC Act Turner unanimously Walker workers