Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative PoliticsParadigms and Sand Castles demonstrates the relationship between thoughtful research design and the collection of persuasive evidence in support of theory. It teaches the craft of research through interesting and carefully selected examples from the field of comparative development studies. Barbara Geddes is Professor of Political Science at the University of California, Los Angeles. |
Contents
Research Design and the Accumulation of Knowledge | 1 |
Big Questions Little Answers How the Questions You Choose Affect the Answers You Get | 27 |
How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get Selection Bias and Related Issues | 89 |
How the Evidence You Use Affects the Answers You Get Rigorous Use of the Evidence Contained in Case Studies | 131 |
How the Approach You Choose Affects the Answers You Get Rational Choice and Its Uses in Comparative Politics | 175 |
Conclusion | 213 |
Other editions - View all
Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in ... Barbara Geddes Limited preview - 2010 |
Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in ... Barbara Geddes Limited preview - 2003 |
Common terms and phrases
actors American analyst approach argu authoritarian average average vote causes chapter collective comparative competitive considered continue countries decisions democracy democratic dependent descendants discussed domain economic edited effect elections electoral evidence examined example exist expected explain factions goals groups growth historical hypotheses ideas identify implications important included increase individuals industrialization institutions interests kinds labor Latin lead leader less Liberal Lipset and Rokkan literature mean measurement ment middle military Nacional observations occur Oligarchic organizations outcome particular parties percent period personalist political possible Postsuffrage preferences Presuffrage problem processes questions rational choice rational choice arguments reason recent regimes relationship remain repression require result rules scholars Science share single-party Social South Korea strategy structural studies suffrage theoretical theory threat tion transitions unions University Press usually variable vote World