Parting Ways: Jewishness and the Critique of Zionism
Judith Butler follows Edward Said’s late suggestion that through a consideration of Palestinian dispossession in relation to Jewish diasporic traditions a new ethos can be forged for a one-state solution. Butler engages Jewish philosophical positions to articulate a critique of political Zionism and its practices of illegitimate state violence, nationalism, and state-sponsored racism. At the same time, she moves beyond communitarian frameworks, including Jewish ones, that fail to arrive at a radical democratic notion of political cohabitation. Butler engages thinkers such as Edward Said, Emmanuel Levinas, Hannah Arendt, Primo Levi, Martin Buber, Walter Benjamin, and Mahmoud Darwish as she articulates a new political ethic. In her view, it is as important to dispute Israel’s claim to represent the Jewish people as it is to show that a narrowly Jewish framework cannot suffice as a basis for an ultimate critique of Zionism. She promotes an ethical position in which the obligations of cohabitation do not derive from cultural sameness but from the unchosen character of social plurality. Recovering the arguments of Jewish thinkers who offered criticisms of Zionism or whose work could be used for such a purpose, Butler disputes the specific charge of anti-Semitic self-hatred often leveled against Jewish critiques of Israel. Her political ethic relies on a vision of cohabitation that thinks anew about binationalism and exposes the limits of a communitarian framework to overcome the colonial legacy of Zionism. Her own engagements with Edward Said and Mahmoud Darwish form an important point of departure and conclusion for her engagement with some key forms of thought derived in part from Jewish resources, but always in relation to the non-Jew.
Butler considers the rights of the dispossessed, the necessity of plural cohabitation, and the dangers of arbitrary state violence, showing how they can be extended to a critique of Zionism, even when that is not their explicit aim. She revisits and affirms Edward Said’s late proposals for a one-state solution within the ethos of binationalism. Butler’s startling suggestion: Jewish ethics not only demand a critique of Zionism, but must transcend its exclusive Jewishness in order to realize the ethical and political ideals of living together in radical democracy.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
anti-Semitism Arab argued articulate basis become belonging binationalism Buber called claim cohabitation colonial commandment condition consider constitutes critical critique cultural Darwish death destruction diasporic discourse dispossession divine violence Eichmann emerges Emmanuel Levinas essay establish exile expulsion face flash formulation framework genocide Gershom Scholem guilt Hannah Arendt happen Holocaust human Israel Israeli Jewish Jews judges judgment justice kill kind land language Law of Return legitimate Levi Levi’s Levinas living Mahmoud Darwish means memory messianic modes moral narrative nation nation-state ofJewish ofthe one’s ontology oppose oppressed Palestine Palestinians perhaps persecution plurality political population possible precisely Primo Levi principles problem question reason refuse relation religion religious responsibility Said’s Scholem secular seeks seems sense Shoah social sovereignty stateless story struggle subjugation suffering theJewish theJews thought tion tradition translation trauma understand understood University Press voice Walter Benjamin words writes Zionism