Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy
In this collection of essays on the core values of liberalism, Stephen Holmes—noted for his scathing reviews of books by liberalism's opponents—challenges commonly held assumptions about liberal theory. By placing it into its original historical context, Passions and Constraints presents an interconnected argument meant to fundamentally change the way we conceive of liberalism.
According to Holmes, three elements of classical liberal theory are commonly used to attack contemporary liberalism as antagonistic to genuine democracy and the welfare state: constitutional constraints on majority rule, the identification of individual freedom with an absence of government involvement, and a strong emphasis on the principle of self-interest. Through insightful essays on Hobbes's analysis of the English Civil War in Behemoth, Bodin's writings on the benefits of limited government, and Mill's views on science and politics, Holmes shows that these basic principles provide, to the contrary, a necessary foundation for the development of democratic, regulatory, and redistributionist politics in the modern era.
Holmes argues that the aspirations of liberal democracy—including individual liberty, the equal dignity of citizens, and a tolerance for diversity—are best understood in relation to two central themes of classical liberal theory: the psychological motivations of individuals and the necessary constraint on individual passions provided by institutions. Paradoxically, Holmes argues that such institutional restraints serve to enable, rather than limit, effective democracy.
In explorations of subjects ranging from self-interest to majoritarianism to "gag rules," Holmes shows that limited government can be more powerful than unlimited government—indeed, that liberalism is one of the most effective philosophies of state building ever contrived. By restricting the arbitrary powers of government officials, Holmes states, a liberal constitution can increase the state's capacity to focus on specific problems and mobilize collective resources for common purposes.
Passions and Constraint is an assessment of what that tradition has meant and what it can mean today.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Liberal Idea
The Secret History of SelfInterest
Hobbess Irrational Man
The Constitution of Sovereignty in Jean Bodin
Precommitment and the Paradox of Democracy
The Positive Constitutionalism of John Stuart Mill
Gag Rules or the Politics of Omission
Welfare and the Liberal Conscience
Other editions - View all
action advocate agenda argued argument authority behavior Behemoth believed bind Bodin Cambridge capacity Cato's Letters chap citizens civil claim classical liberals collective common conflict consent constitutional constitutionalism David Hume debate decision democratic discussion doctrine economic electoral enforce Essays example Federalist Papers framers freedom gag rules Hobbes Hobbes's human Hume Ibid idea individual inherited institutions interests irrational issue J. M. Robson Jean Bodin Jefferson John Stuart Mill justice justified king legislative Leviathan liberal democracy liberty limited Locke Madison majoritarian majority ment Mill's modern monarch Montesquieu moral motives nature negative liberty never norm paradox parties passions peace political positive liberty precommitment prince principle problems protect psychological question reason religion religious rulers secular self-binding self-interest slavery Smith social sovereign sovereignty strategy subjects theorists theory thought tion tional tive toleration tradition Treatises of Government tyranny University Press unto Wealth of Nations welfare
All Book Search results »
Shaping the Next One Hundred Years: New Methods for Quantitative, Long-Term ...
Robert J. Lempert
No preview available - 2003