Paterculus: The Tiberian Narrative
This volume deals with the most controversial part of Velleius' work, regarded by the majority of modern scholars as a panegyrical biography of Tiberius and used as an excuse for dismissing the historical value of Velleius' whole work. In the introduction Dr Woodman considers the nature of the Tiberian narrative in the light of the literary tradition, and argues that it is no more panegyrical than some of the most admired products of Roman historiography such as Livy and Ammianus. He also considers the transmission of Velleius' text since its discovery in 1515, and argues that, contrary to the opinion of most nineteenth and twentieth-century editors, Rhenanus' editio princeps of 1520 is a more reliable authority than Amerbach's apograph of 1516. Dr Woodman provides a full apparatus criticus, and an extensive commentary which is intended for use by students and specialists in Roman literature, historiography, and history.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
adiutor Agrippa alii animi anno Arminius atque Augustus bellum Burer Burman Caesar Cicero clades conjecture corruption cuius cura Curt Drusus ducis e.g. Cic eius Ellis emendation emperor erat esset etiam exercitus follows fortuna Gaius Gelenius Germanicus Germany Haase Halm Heinsius historians hostium Illyricum imperial imperium Koestermann Kritz later Latin legatus Lipsius Livy magis Maroboduus military Mnem narrative neque nihil omnia omnibus Orelli paene panegyric paradosis phrase phraseology PIR2 Plin praef princeps publicae quae quaestor quam quidem quod quoque reading reference rei publicae reign Rhenanus Roman Romani Rome Ruhnken Sall Sallust scholars Seager seditio Sejanus senate sentence sibi Steffen Stegmann Suet Suetonius suggested Sumner suprascr Syme Tacitus Tiberian Tiberius Timpe topos uiri uiro uirtus V.'s account Varus Velleian verb Vinicius Vossius Woodman word