Patients, Power and the Poor in Eighteenth-Century BristolWhile much is known about the leaders of the medical profession in the eighteenth century, little has been written about rank-and-file practitioners--the apothecaries, blood-letters, and herb-women--or about the patients they treated. Focusing on Bristol, the book examines how the poor gradually lost medical autonomy and authority over their bodies, as the city's hospital was transformed from a charity to a medical workplace by the contingencies of urban apprenticeship and changes in the structure of the city's medical occupations. As hospitals assumed the role of training surgeons and apothecaries, they fostered a new style of medicine that augmented medical authority, and which was inimical to patients, whose ability to interpret their own ailments and maintain some measure of autonomy was destroyed by the medical knowledge created and maintained by the hospital's educational function. The book details how poor and working-class patients chose among practitioners, how they used the new institution of the hospital, and how they utilized the Old Poor Law in times of need. It moves beyond heath-care provision to discuss how lay people of the time understood their bodies and how those beliefs came into conflict with the new order of medical practitioners. |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Everyone their own physician | 16 |
The marketplace of medicine | 37 |
Charity universal? | 74 |
The client | 94 |
The abdication of the governors ΠΙΟ | 110 |
Surgeons and the medicalization of the hospital | 126 |
The patients perspective | 148 |
Other editions - View all
Patients, Power and the Poor in Eighteenth-Century Bristol Mary E. Fissell No preview available - 1991 |
Patients, Power and the Poor in Eighteenth-Century Bristol Mary Elizabeth Fissell,Mary E. Fissell No preview available - 2002 |
Common terms and phrases
Account apothecaries appearance apprentices apprenticeship authority barber-surgeons became body Bristol Cambridge University Press changes Chapter charity claimed common course created culture cure death discussed disease dissection doctors Dyer early eighteenth century emphasized England English evidence examination example experience forms friends given healing History hospital included individual Infirmary instance institution interest interpretation James John Journal kind knowledge late later London manners means medicine nature noted nursing Oxford parish patients percent physical physicians political Poor Law popular practice practitioners probably professional pupils Quaker records reform relationship relief religion remained remedies Richard role Roy Porter rural Second seems served significant signs similar Smith social Society Somerset structure Studies subscribers suggests surgeons Thomas tion took urban vernacular woman women workhouse