Personal Sureties Under the Miller Act: Inadequate Payment Protection for Small Business Construction Subcontractors : Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Federal Spending, Budget, and Accounting of the Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundredth Congress, First Session, August 11, 1987, Tampa, FL.
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Governmental Affairs. Subcommittee on Federal Spending, Budget, and Accounting
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1988 - Government contractors - 66 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
acceptable affidavit agencies allow alternative amended American amount approved asked assets Association attorney authority awarded Baldock Base believe cabinets certificate Chairman claim committee Congress construction contracting officer corporate sureties court D.J. Barclay default Department DeVolk effect executed fact Farm Federal Government fees Force furnished going Governmental House Hughes included individual sureties interest issue Jackson judge judgment Kentucky labor letter of credit limit listed Management material Miller Act paid payment bond performance personal sureties pledged position President prime contractor problem procedures procurement test proposed protection questions reason regulations Representatives resolution respect Senator Chiles Service signed situation statements subcontractors submit subsection suit suppliers supplying surety bonds test plan testimony Thank Treasury trying United worth
Page 64 - resolution" means only a joint resolution of the Congress, the matter after the resolving clause of which is as follows: "That the Congress approves the procurement test plan numbered transmitted to the Congress by the Administrator on 19 ." The blank spaces therein are to be filled appropriately. The term does not include a resolution which specifies more than one procurement test plan. (f)
Page 18 - surety fails to perform, the public body is forced to absorb the loss. The FAR regulations require that at least two individual sureties must execute the bond and the net worth of each must equal or exceed the penal amount of the bond. However, when an individual surety is approved based
Page 66 - plan, and a single quorum call at the conclusion of the debate if requested in accordance with the rules of the appropriate House, the vote on final passage of the resolution shall occur. (4) Appeals from the decisions of the Chair relating to the application of the rules of the Senate or the House of Representatives, as the case may be, to the procedure relating to a resolution
Page 63 - Under provisions contained in a procurement test plan, any provision thereof may be effective at a time later than the date on which the plan otherwise is effective.
Page 64 - (1) No later than the first day of session following the day on which a procurement test plan is transmitted to the House of Representatives and the Senate under subsection (b),
Page 66 - If, prior to the passage by one House of a resolution of that House, that House receives a resolution with respect to the same
Page 66 - been received from the other House; but (B) the vote on final passage shall be on the resolution of the other House.
Page 65 - If the committee to which is referred a resolution introduced pursuant to paragraph (1) of subsection (f) (or, in the absence of such a resolution, the first resolution introduced with respect to the same