Philosophy and the Criminal Law: Principle and Critique
R. A. Duff
Cambridge University Press, Feb 13, 1998 - Law - 261 pages
Five pre-eminent legal theorists tackle a range of fundamental questions on the nature of the philosophy of criminal law. Their essays explore the extent to which and the ways in which our systems of criminal law can be seen as rational and principled. The essays discuss some of the principles by which, it is often thought, a system of law should be structured, and they ask whether our own systems are genuinely principled or riven by basic contradictions, reflecting deeper political and social conflicts.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Reflections on the Encounter between Critique and the Philosophy of the Criminal Law
2 Does Criminal Liability Require an Act?
3 Simulacra of Morality? Beyond the IdealActual Antinomiesof Criminal Justice
abstract account of well-being act requirement action-reasons actions actus reus agents analysis answer Antony Duff argue argument Ashworth autonomy Blackstone Categorical Imperative claim classiﬁcation coherence committed concems conception conﬂict context contradiction control requirement courts crim crime criminal law doctrine criminal law theory criminal legal practices criminal liability requires criminal responsibility criminalisation Critical Legal Studies critical theorists culpability defendant deﬁned deﬁnitional difﬁculties discussion distinction Duff evaluative example excuse ﬁnd ﬁrst focus harm Harré ideal imposed inal intention interpretation issues justiﬁed Kant Kant’s Kantian kind Lacey law’s liberal mens rea Michael Moore Model Penal Code modem Moore Moore’s moral agency moral community moral responsibility motive normative Norrie offences one’s Oxford particular penal person philosophical political principles question rational rationalisation reasons recognise reﬂect relevant requires an act role satisﬁed sense signiﬁcant social social constructionism speciﬁc status Stephen structure substantive sufﬁcient symbiosis thesis tion University Press wrong