Physician-Assisted Suicide: What are the Issues?: What are the Issues?
L.M. Kopelman, K.A. de Ville
Springer Science & Business Media, Nov 30, 2001 - Medical - 252 pages
Physician-Assisted Suicide: What are the Issues? offers a detailed discussion of recent supreme court rulings that have had an impact on the contemporary debate in the United States and elsewhere over physician-assisted suicide. Two rulings by the U.S. Supreme Court have altered the contemporary debate on physician-assisted suicide: Washington v. Glucksberg (1997) and Vacco v. Quill (1997). In these cases, the Supreme Court ruled that state laws could prohibit assisted suicide and, therefore, physician-assisted suicide. These rulings mark the apex of over two decades of unprecedented litigation regarding end-of-life care and signal the beginning of a new clinical, ethical, and legal debate over the extent of an individual's rights to control the timing, manner, and means of his/her death.
The debate over suicide and assisting suicide is ancient and contentious and intertwined with questions about the permissibility of voluntary active euthanasia or mercy killing. Responses to these issues can be divided into those who defend physician-assisted suicide and many of these other activities and those who object. But those who object may do so on principled grounds in that they regard these activities as wrong in all cases, or non-principled, in that they believe there are more prudent, less disruptive or more efficient policies. The authors in this book sort out these responses and look at the assumptions underlying them. Several of these authors give startling new interpretations that a culture gap, deeper and wider than that in the abortion debate, exists.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Contemporary Debate Over PhysicianAssisted Suicide
Another Battle in the Culture Wars
RefusalsWithdrawals and PhysicianAssisted Suicide
PhysicianAssisted Suicide The Worry About Abuse
Is There a Slippery Slope from Suicide to Assisted Suicide to Consensual Euthanasia?
Does PhysicianAssisted Suicide Promote Liberty and Compassion?
PhysicianAssisted Suicide and the Culture of Romantic Rescue
PhysicianAssisted Suicide A Clinicians Perspective
The Culture of Medicine and the Undertreatment of Pain
Managed Health Care at the End of Life
Short Medium and Long Term
Safe Legal Rare? PhysicianAssisted Suicide and Cultural Change in the Future
A Proposal for Legalizing Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia in South Africa
NOTES ON CONTRIBUTORS
AIDS Alzheimer's disease American Medical Association argue argument assistance in dying assistance with dying assisted suicide autonomy Battin bioethicists Bioethics Brody cancer causal cause chronic clinical clinicians competent constitutional cost Court culture debate decisions disease doctor Draft Bill dying patients East Carolina University end-of-life England Journal Epictetus Glucksberg goals hasten death health care professionals hospice human hydration individual ISBN issue Journal of Medicine killing legalizing physician-assisted suicide legislation MCOs means Medical Ethics Medicare moral difference one's options Oregon pain control pain management pain relief palliative patient's death permissible permissibly permitting physician-assisted suicide persons philosophers physicians pill prohibition Quill reasons relieve request right to refuse risk safeguards scientific slippery slope social suffering suicide and euthanasia suicide and voluntary suicide or voluntary terminal sedation terminally ill terminally ill patients treatment U.S. Supreme Court University Vacco voluntary active euthanasia withdrawing feeding tubes York
All Book Search results »
Cross-Cultural Perspectives on the (Im)Possibility of Global Bioethics
J. Tao Lai Po-wah
No preview available - 2002