Pitied But Not Entitled: Single Mothers and the History of Welfare, 1890-1935

Front Cover
Harvard University Press, 1995 - History - 433 pages
1 Review

With three-fourths of all poor families headed by women and about 54 percent of single-mother families living below the poverty line, a rethinking of the fundamental assumptions of our much-reviled welfare program is clearly necessary. Here, Linda Gordon unearths the tangled roots of AFDC (Aid to Families with Dependent Children). Competing visions of how and to whom public aid should be distributed were advanced by male bureaucrats, black women's organizations, and white progressive feminists. From their policy debates emerged a two-track system of public aid, in which single mothers got highly stigmatized "welfare" while other groups, such as the aged and the unemployed, received "entitlements."

Gordon strips today's welfare debates of decades of irrelevant and irrational accretion, revealing that what appeared progressive in the 1930s is antiquated in the 1990s. She shows that only by shedding false assumptions, and rethinking the nature of poverty, can we advance a truly effective welfare reform.

From inside the book

What people are saying - Write a review

Pitied but not entitled: single mothers and the history of welfare, 1890-1935

User Review  - Not Available - Book Verdict

In this book, Gordon (Women's Body, Women's Right: The History of Birth Control in America, LJ 12/1/76) traces the development of the federal welfare system. Beginning at the early part of this ... Read full review

Contents

The Facts and the Social Problem
15
Maternalism Mothers Pensions
37
The Social Work Perspective
67
Copyright

6 other sections not shown

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

References to this book

All Book Search results »

About the author (1995)

McGraw-Hill authors represent the leading experts in their fields and are dedicated to improving the lives, careers, and interests of readers worldwide

Bibliographic information