Prejudicial Appearances: The Logic of American Antidiscrimination Law
DIVIn Prejudicial Appearances noted legal scholar Robert C. Post argues modern American antidiscrimination law should not be conceived as protecting the transcendental dignity of individual persons but instead as transforming social practices that define and sustain potentially oppressive categories like race or gender. Arguing that the prevailing logic of American antidiscrimination law is misleading, Post lobbies for deploying sociological understandings to reevaluate the antidiscrimination project in ways that would render the law more effective and just.
Four distinguished commentators respond to Post’s provocative essay. Each adopts a distinctive perspective. K. Anthony Appiah investigates the philosophical logic of stereotyping and of equality. Questioning whether the law ought to endorse any social practices that define persons, Judith Butler explores the tension between sociological and postmodern approaches to antidiscrimination law. Thomas C. Grey examines whether Post’s proposal can be reconciled with the values of the rule of law. And Reva B. Siegel applies critical race theory to query whether antidiscrimination law’s reshaping of race and gender should best be understood in terms of practices of subordination and stratification.
By illuminating the consequential rhetorical maneuvers at the heart of contemporary U.S. antidiscrimination law, Prejudical Appearances forces readers to reappraise the relationship between courts of law and social behavior. As such, it will enrich scholars interested in the relationships between law, rhetoric, postmodernism, race, and gender.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
K Anthony Appiah Stereotypes and the Shaping of Identity
Judith Butler Appearances Aside
Post Response to Commentators
Other editions - View all
affirmative action African American American antidiscrimination law antidis antisubordination argue basis of race BFOQ characteristics characterize civil rights civil rights law claims codes color blindness discourse Colorblind Constitutionalism constitute context court cultural debate decisions differential discrimination law discriminatory discussion disparate distinction distributive doctrine dominant conception dress EEOC employers employment Equal Protection example female formal-race discourse functional rationality gender and race gender conventions Griggs group-categorical hire identity individual instrumental rationality invidious irrelevant judge judgments Judith Butler justice lookism male moral person Post's practice of gender prejudice Prejudicial Appearances Price Waterhouse principles prohibit question race and gender race-neutral requires Reva rhetoric Robert Post Santa Cruz Santa Cruz ordinance sex discrimination sexual harassment Siegel social meaning social practices social relevance social stratification sociohistorical sociological account Southwest Airlines status status-race stereotypes Supp supra note 20 Title VII traits transformation trope of blindness understand United Air Lines women