Principles of Biomedical EthicsThis edition represents a thorough-going revision of what has become a classic text in biomedical ethics. Major structural changes mark the revision. The authors have added a new concluding chapter on methods that, along with its companion chapter on moral theory, emphasizes convergence across theories, coherence in moral justification, and the common morality. They have simplified the opening chapter on moral norms which introduces the framework of prima facie moral principles and ways to specify and balance them. Together with the shift of advanced material on theory to the back of the book, this heavily revised introductory chapter will make it easier for the wide range of students entering bioethics courses to use this text. Another important change is the increased emphasis on character and moral agency, drawing the distinction between agents and actions. The sections on truth telling, disclosure of bad news, privacy, conflicts of interest, and research on human subjects have also been throughly reworked. The four core chapters on principles (respect for autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice) and the chapter on professional-patient relationships retain their familiar structure, but the authors have completely updated their content to reflect developments in philosophical analysis as well as in research, medicine, and health care. Throughout, they have used a number of actual cases to illuminate and to test their theory, method, and framework of principles. |
What people are saying - Write a review
Reviews aren't verified, but Google checks for and removes fake content when it's identified
User Review - Flag as inappropriate
Page 63-335
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accept actions American analysis appears argue argument Association attempt authority autonomy balance believe benefits cause Chapter choice circumstances claim clinical competent conception confidentiality conflicts consent considered costs court criticism death decision-making decisions determine developed discussion disease distribution effect equal ethics evidence example exists first goals harm health care hospital human ideals important individuals institutional interests involves Journal judgments justice justified killing limited lives means Medicine moral norms nursing obligation organs Oxford particular patients persons Philosophy physician policies possible practice preferences present principles problems procedures professional protect question reason refuse relationships Report requires respect responsibility result risk role rules social society sometimes specific standard subjects theory tion transplant treat treatment understanding University Press utilitarian utility values virtues York