Private Security, Public Order: The Outsourcing of Public Services and Its Limits
Simon Chesterman, Angelina Fisher
OUP Oxford, Nov 5, 2009 - Law - 272 pages
Private actors are increasingly taking on roles traditionally arrogated to the state. Both in the industrialized North and the developing South, functions essential to external and internal security and to the satisfaction of basic human needs are routinely contracted out to non-state agents. In the area of privatization of security functions, attention by academics and policy makers tends to focus on the activities of private military and security companies, especially in the context of armed conflicts, and their impact on human rights and post-conflict stability and reconstruction. The first edited volume emerging from New York University School of Law's Institute for International Justice project on private military and security companies, From Mercenaries to Market: The Rise and Regulation of Private Military Companies broadened this debate to situate the private military phenomenon in the context of moves towards the regulation of activities through market and non-market mechanisms. Where that first volume looked at the emerging market for use of force, this second volume looks at the transformations in the nature of state authority. Drawing on insights from work on privatization, regulation, and accountability in the emerging field of global administrative law, the book examines private military and security companies through the wider lens of private actors performing public functions. In the past two decades, the responsibilities delegated to such actors - especially but not only in the United States - have grown exponentially. The central question of this volume is whether there should be any limits on government capacity to outsource traditionally "public" functions. Can and should a government put out to private tender the fulfilment of military, intelligence, and prison services? Can and should it transfer control of utilities essential to life, such as the supply of water? This discussion incorporates numerous perspectives on regulatory and governance issues in the private provision of public functions, but focuses primarily on private actors offering services that impact the fundamental rights of the affected population.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The privatization of Violence
The responsibility of states
Accountability to Whom?
The privatization continuum
The decisionmaking process on privatization
Whether governments should privatize
Some policy implications
Human rights and selfregulation in the apparel industry
Alternative forms of regulation in the apparel industry
Private prisons and the democratic deficit
Scope for a new administrative law?
Regulatory choices in the privatization of infrastructure
How governments privatize
Private security public order
Other editions - View all
abuses accountability actions activities acts administrative agencies apparel industry authority chapter committed competition concerns confidentiality regulations context corporate costs courts crimes criminal insiders decision delegated discussed effective employees enforcement ensure example exercise extraordinary rendition extraterritorial jurisdiction Fair Labor Association functions global grievance mechanisms guidelines host human rights incentives informants infrastructure sectors inherently governmental institutions international humanitarian law international law investigative involvement IPOA Iraq labour rights legislation limits military and security monitoring obligation Office organizational insiders organizations outsourcing oversight participation peacekeeping peacekeeping operations PMSCs operate police political principle private actors private companies private contractors private entity private military Private Military Companies Private Military Contractors private prisons private providers Private Security privatization of military prosecutors protect public-private partnerships question regulatory framework require responsibility role security companies PMSCs security services state’s Sweatshops transnational transparency undercover agents University violations waterboarding Worker Rights Consortium Xstrata