Privatizing Social Security
University of Chicago Press, Sep 1, 1998 - Business & Economics - 471 pages
This volume represents the most important work to date on one of the pressing policy issues of the moment: the privatization of social security. Although social security is facing enormous fiscal pressure in the face of an aging population, there has been relatively little published on the fundamentals of essential reform through privatization. Privatizing Social Security fills this void by studying the methods and problems involved in shifting from the current system to one based on mandatory saving in individual accounts.
"Timely and important. . . . [Privatizing Social Security] presents a forceful case for a radical shift from the existing unfunded, pay-as-you-go single national program to a mandatory funded program with individual savings accounts. . . . An extensive analysis of how a privatized plan would work in the United States is supplemented with the experiences of five other countries that have privatized plans." —Library Journal
"[A] high-powered collection of essays by top experts in the field."—Timothy Taylor, Public Interest
What people are saying - Write a review
Privatizing social securityUser Review - Not Available - Book Verdict
Widespread recent interest in the financial viability of the Social Security system in the 21st century makes this book, edited by Harvard economist Feldstein, timely and important. A massive and ... Read full review
The Chilean Pension Reform A Pioneering Program
Australias Retirement Income System
The Roles of the Public and Private Sectors in the UK Pension System
Pension System Reform The Mexican Case
The Shift to a Funded Social Security System The Case of Argentina
The Transition Path in Privatizing Social Security
Simulating the Privatization of Social Security in General Equilibrium
Privatizing Social Security FirstRound Effects of a Generic Voluntary Privatized US Social Security System
Individual Financial Decisions in Retirement Saving Plans and the Provision of Resources for Retirement
Administrative Costs in Public and Private Retirement Systems
Other editions - View all
accumulated administrative costs AFJP AFPs analysis Andrew Samwick annuity Argentina asset allocation average basic state pension basis points billion bonds calculations Chile Chilean cohort consumption tax deadweight loss deficit defined-benefit defined-contribution disability earnings economic effect employees equity expenses Feldstein funded system gain growth higher IMSS income tax increase indexed individual retirement accounts investment Jeffrey Liebman Kotlikoff labor supply lump sum mandatory MIRA contributions mutual funds participants pay-as-you-go PAYGO payroll tax pension funds pension plans pension reform pension system percent of GDP percentage personal pensions portfolio present value private pension privatized system privatizing social security rate of return real interest rate reduced result retirement system revenue Samwick SERPS simulations social security benefits social security system spouse and survivor superannuation survivor benefits tax financing tax rate TIAA-CREF tion transition trust fund wage workers Yes No Yes Yprog Yprog Yprog
Page vi - The interval is allowed for the receipt of any memorandum of dissent or reservation, together with a brief statement of his reasons, that any member may wish to express; and such memorandum of dissent or reservation shall be published with the manuscript if he so desires. Publication does not. however, imply that each member of the Board has read the manuscript, or that either members of the Board in general, or of the special committee, have passed upon its validity in every detail.
Page vi - Director, consisting of three Directors selected as nearly as may be one from each general division of the Board. The names of the special manuscript committee shall be stated to each Director when the summary and report described in paragraph (4) are sent to him.
Page vi - Board, requesting approval or disapproval of publication, and thirty additional days shall be granted for this purpose. The manuscript shall then not be published unless at least a majority of the entire Board and a...
Page vi - Presidents), consisting of three Directors selected as nearly as may be one from each general division of the Board. The names of the special manuscript committee shall be stated to each Director when notice of the proposed publication is submitted to him.
Page vi - Directors to the Work and Publications of the National Bureau of Economic Research 1. The object of the National Bureau of Economic Research is to ascertain and to present to the public important economic facts and their interpretation in a scientific and impartial manner. The Board of Directors is charged with the responsibility of ensuring that the work of the National Bureau is carried on in strict conformity with this object.
Page vi - Board, or to its Executive Committee, for their formal adoption, all specific proposals concerning researches to be instituted.
Page vi - Relation of the Directors to the Work and Publications of the National Bureau of Economic Research 1. The object of the National Bureau of Economic Research is to ascertain and to present to the public important economic facts and their interpretation in a scientific and impartial manner.
Page vi - Board and a two-thirds majority of those members of the Board who shall have voted on the proposal within the time fixed for the receipt of votes on the publication proposed shall have approved. 6. No manuscript may be published, though approved by each member of the special committee, until forty-five days have elapsed from the transmittal of the summary and report.
Page vi - Ementi) shall be appointed by majority agreement of the President and Vice Presidents (or by the Executive Committee in case of inability to decide on the part of the President and Vice Presidents), consisting of three Directors selected as nearly as may be one from each general division of the Board.
Page 16 - ... present value. That skepticism would be warranted in a static economy but is not appropriate when economic growth is continually enlarging the size of the Social Security liability. Shifting from an unfunded program to a funded one is an application of the general principle that, when you discover you are in a hole, the first thing to do is to stop digging. Shifting to a funded system eliminates the future losses associated with future increases in the size of Social Security wealth. In the first...