Proceedings of ... National Conference, American Society for Judicial Settlement of Inter National Disputes, Volume 3
Williams and Wilkins., 1913 - Arbitration (International law)
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action adjustment adopted agree agreement Alabama claims American applied appointed arbitral justice arise Article Articles of Confederation Bar Association Britain century Chairman citizens committee Congress constitution Court of Arbitration court of justice decision determine diplomatic established existence fact favor federal force foreign France fundamental rights Hague Conference Hague Convention Hague Peace Hague Peace Conference Hague tribunal Hay-Pauncefote treaty honor impartial individuals interests international arbitration international controversies international court international disputes international law James Brown Scott judges judgment judicial settlement judiciary jurisdiction lawyers litigants matter ment nature organization Panama Canal parties Peace Conference permanent court persons plaintiff political practice present President principles procedure proposed court public opinion question recognized relations represented respect rules Russia second Hague Senate session settled settlement of international sovereign sovereignty submitted Supreme Court territory tion treaty treaty of 1818 United Venezuela York State Bar
Page 21 - ... or executive authority of the other State in controversy, and a day assigned for the appearance of the parties by their lawful agents, who shall then be directed to appoint, by joint consent, commissioners or judges to constitute a court for hearing and determining the matter in question...
Page 20 - State, where the cause shall be tried, "well and truly to hear and determine the matter in question, according to the best of his judgment, without favor, affection or hope of reward": provided also, that no State shall be deprived of territory for the benefit of the United States. All controversies concerning the private right of soil claimed under different grants of two or more States, whose...
Page 69 - Rules, on terms of entire equality, so that there shall be no discrimination against any such nation, or its citizens or subjects, in respect of the conditions or charges of traffic, or otherwise.
Page 71 - Differences which may arise of a legal nature or relating to the interpretation of treaties existing between the two Contracting Parties and which it may not have been possible to settle by diplomacy...
Page 175 - Neither the questions put, nor the remarks made by members of the tribunal in the course of the discussions, can be regarded as an expression of opinion by the tribunal in general or by its members in particular. ARTICLE 73 The tribunal is authorized to declare its competence in interpreting the compromis, as well as the other treaties which may be invoked, and in applying the principles of law.
Page 65 - In each individual case the high contracting parties, before appealing to the permanent court of arbitration shall conclude a special agreement defining clearly the matter in dispute, the scope of the powers of the arbitrators, and the period to be fixed for the formation of the arbitral tribunal and the several stages of the procedure.
Page 174 - The Tribunal can, besides, require from the agents of the parties the production of all papers, and can demand all necessary explanations. In case of refusal the Tribunal takes note of it. Article 70 The agents and the counsel of the parties are authorized to present orally to the Tribunal all the arguments they may consider expedient in defense of their case.
Page 21 - We are unanimously of opinion, that the state of Connecticut has no right to the lands in controversy.' ' We are also unanimously of opinion, that the jurisdiction and pre-emption of all the territory lying within the charter boundary of Pennsylvania, and now claimed by the state of Connecticut, do of right belong to the state of Pennsylvania.'* "This decision, pursuant to the articles of the confederation of the states was final.
Page 35 - Sitting, as it were, as an international, as well as a domestic tribunal, we apply Federal law, state law, and international law, as the exigencies of the particular case may demand.