Prohibiting secure juvenile detention: assessing the effectiveness of national standards detention criteria
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
05 level adult jails Advisory Committee's criteria appear and rearrest appear for court appear rates child Community Research Forum Comunity Coun court hearings Cuyahoga County detention abuse detention according detention practices detention rates difference between proportions disposition of original eligible for detention failure to appear final disposition Gloucester and Salt Gloucester County Gonion higher rate implement Inference decision Jersey juvenile court juvenile court judge juvenile detention centers Juvenile Justice Lenewee County level of significance meet national standards meeting the criteria national standards criteria national standards detention null hypothesis orderly court process Passaic County prior to final probation office proportions test public safety rate of failure rates of Gloucester rearrest rates rearrests occurring prior released represent a significant Salt Lake County sample secure custody secure detention significant difference significantly standard score status offense substantially meets tention teria tion Total percent trial tween urban jurisdictions venile youth Z-score