“Race,” Rights and the Law in the Supreme Court of Canada: Historical Case Studies

Front Cover
Wilfrid Laurier Univ. Press, Jan 1, 2006 - Political Science - 463 pages
0 Reviews

Four cases in which the legal issue was “race” — that of a Chinese restaurant owner who was fined for employing a white woman; a black man who was refused service in a bar; a Jew who wanted to buy a cottage but was prevented by the property owners’ association; and a Trinidadian of East Indian descent who was acceptable to the Canadian army but was rejected for immigration on grounds of “race” — drawn from the period between 1914 and 1955, are intimately examined to explore the role of the Supreme Court of Canada and the law in the racialization of Canadian society. With painstaking research into contemporary attitudes and practices, Walker demonstrates that Supreme Court Justices were expressing the prevailing “common sense” about “race” in their legal decisions. He shows that injustice on the grounds of “race” has been chronic in Canadian history, and that the law itself was once instrumental in creating these circumstances. The book concludes with a controversial discussion of current directions in Canadian law and their potential impact on Canada’s future as a multicultural society.


What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.


Chapter 1 Orientation
Chapter 2 Quong Wing v The King
Chapter 3 Christie v York Corporation
Chapter 4 Noble and Wolf v Alley
Chapter 5 NarineSingh v Attorney General of Canada
Chapter 6 Implications

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

References to this book

All Book Search results »

About the author (2006)

James W. St. G. Walker has published several books and articles on the history of race relations in Canada, including The Black Loyalists: The Search for a Promised Land in Nova Scotia and Sierra Leone (2nd ed.). He is currently an associate professor of history at the University of Waterloo.

Bibliographic information