Race and Racism in Continental PhilosophyThe 15 original essays in Race and Racism in Continental Philosophy explore the resources that continental philosophy brings to debates about contemporary race theory and investigate the racism of some of Europe's most important thinkers. Attention is devoted to the influence of the work of W. E. B. Du Bois, Jean-Paul Sartre, Richard Wright, and Frantz Fanon. Questions about race in European philosophy -- especially in the work of Nietzsche, Heidegger, Lévi-Strauss, and Arendt -- are also considered. This volume provides an indispensable critical introduction to new perspectives on thinking about race and racism. |
Ką žmonės sako - Rašyti recenziją
Neradome recenzijų įprastose vietose.
Kiti leidimai - Peržiūrėti viską
Race and Racism in Continental Philosophy Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Philosophy Robert Bernasconi,Robert Bernasconi,Sybol Cook Trumpų ištraukų rodinys - 2003 |
Pagrindiniai terminai ir frazės
according African alienation already American anti-Semitism appears argues attempt become biological blood body Bois Bois's BSWM called Césaire civilization claim colonial color complex conception condition constituted construction continues created critical critique culture decadence dependency describes determined dialectic discussion essay essential European existence experience expression fact Fanon feeling force French German given Hegel Heidegger Henceforth human idea ideal identity important individual Jewish Jews language Lévi-Strauss liberal lived logic Mannoni matter meaning moral nature Nazi Negro never Nietzsche notion object original particular person philosophy political position possible present Press problem produced question race racial racism reading reality reason recognize reference relation result Sartre Sartre's seems sense situation Skin social society spirit suggests theory thinking thought tion trans understanding United University values violence Voegelin Volk Wright writes York
Populiarios ištraukos
18 psl. - I need only remark that it is by no means unusual, upon comparing the thoughts which an author has expressed in regard to his subject, whether in ordinary conversation or in writing, to find that we understand him better than he has understood himself. As he has not sufficiently determined his concept, he has sometimes spoken, or even thought, in opposition to his own intention.