Random Justice: On Lotteries and Legal Decision-Making
Chance inevitably plays a role in law but it is not often that we consciously try to import an element of randomness into a legal process. Random Justice: On Lotteries and Legal Decision-Making explores the potential for the use of lotteries in social, and particularly legal, decision-makingcontexts. Utilizing a variety of disciplines and materials, Neil Duxbury considers in detail the history, advantages, and drawbacks of deciding issues of social significance by lot and argues that the value of the lottery as a legal decision-making device has generally been underestimated. The very fact that there exists widespread resistance to the use of lotteries for legal decision-making purposesbetrays a commonly held belief that legal processes are generally more important than are legal outcomes. Where,owing to the existence of indeterminacy, the process of reasoning is likely to be excessively protracted and thereasons provided strongly contestable, the most cost-efficient and impartial decision-making strategy may well be recourse to lot. Aversion to this strategy, while generally understandable, is not necessarily rational. Yet in law, as Professor Duxbury demonstrates, reason is generally valued morehighly than is rationality. The lottery is often conceived to be a decision-making device that operates in isolation. Yet lotteries can frequently and profitably be incorporated into other decision-frameworks. The book concludes by controversially considering how lotteries might be so incorporated and also advances the thesisthat it may sometimes be sensible to require that adjudication takes place in the shadow of a lottery.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contextualizing the Lottery
Relying on Luck
Dicing with Juslice
Lotteries within Legal Frameworks
Other editions - View all
according adjudication advantages American Amos Tversky application argued best interests Cambridge University Press candidates Chapter child custody choice citizens claim Clarendon Press coin concerning considered course courts criminal custody disputes Daniel Kahneman deci decision-making by lot Democracy determine device draft lottery Economic embankment ensure Ethics example fact furthermore game theory Guido Calabresi human Ibid idea incentive instances John John Broome Jon Elster Journal judge jurors jury selection Justice likelibood litigation London lot-casting lottery outcome lottery voting luck matter medical resources mixed strategy Mnookin moral Moral Luck Nash equilibrium Nicholas Rescher non-weighted lottery normative observation Oxford particular parties political possible practice probably problem procedural fairness procedural justice proposal purpose question random allocation random selection randomized social randomly rational reasons representatives require resolve resort to lot Ronald Dworkin scarce sion-making social decision-making sometimes sortition strategy survival lottery Theory tion trial weighted lottery
Which Way Social Justice in Mathematics Education?
Limited preview - 2003
All Book Search results »
'God dobbelt niet': realiteiten en mythen van kansspelregulering
No preview available - 2004