Recovering Argument: A Guide to Critical Thinking and Writing

Front Cover
Universal-Publishers, 1999 - Language Arts & Disciplines - 108 pages
0 Reviews
"Recovering Argument" is a textbook or handbook that sounds a revolutionary call to teachers & students of rhetoric, asking, as it implicitly does, for a return to reason as the basis of all argument. The implied purpose of the book is to recover argument from its current status among teachers, who often view composition as a merely personal exercise, with an emphasis upon "invention" (now the most important part of so-called "process" writing). It attempts to provide a framework for understanding discourse & its position & function in a democratic society. In addition to calling for a return to reason, "Recovering Argument" suggests new models & approaches to the teaching of writing. A model of communication (a "humanistic" model) is offered as a replacement for the widely-accepted analogy that would turn writer & audience into radio transmitters & receivers. A new treatment of "audience" clearly & succinctly demonstrates that the writer does not need to be a slave to demographics, but rather that the writer of any argument must search for truth, however unpalatable that truth may be to the audience. A much-needed review of the differences between spoken & written language is provided herein, & the reader is shown the placement of argument within the Western rhetorical tradition & the importance of the continuing dialogue that began with Plato & Aristotle. This brief text could be used in a college or upper-level high school course in rhetoric or writing as a supplementary text or as the core text in addition to supplementary readings. The freshness of the material is sure to stimulate thought & discussion. The examples of argument in the appendix provide a foundation for individual response & for further study.

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Selected pages


Writer and Audience
Argument and Its Forms
Concepts for Argument
Understanding Argument
Response and Claim in Argument
Analogy and Argument
Abstraction Generality and Clarity in Argument
Cause and Effect Reasoning
Deduction and Induction
Common Fallacies
Emotional Appeals
A Note on Insults and Hate Language
A Brief Usage Guide

Common terms and phrases

About the author (1999)

Mezo received his Ph.D. in English from the University of North Dakota in 1978 and completed a study in Education at Western Washington University in 1988. He has taught at colleges and universities in the U.S. and overseas. He teaches at the University of Maryland University College, Asian Division.

Bibliographic information