Reforming Regulatory Impact Analysis

Front Cover
Winston Harrington, Lisa Heinzerling, Richard D. Morgenstern
Earthscan, 2009 - Political Science - 246 pages
Over the past decades, considerable debate has emerged surrounding the use of cost-benefit analysis (CBA) to analyze and make recommendations for environmental and safety regulations. Critics argue that CBA forces values on unquantifiable factors, that it does not adequately measure benefits across generations, and that it is not adaptable in situations of uncertainty. Proponents, on the other hand, believe that a well-done CBA provides useful, albeit imperfect, information to policymakers precisely because of the standard metrics that are applied across the analysis. Largely absent from the debate have been practical questions about how the use of CBA could be improved. Relying on the assumption that CBA will remain an important component in the regulatory process, this new work from Resources for the Future brings together experts representing both sides of the debate to analyze the use of CBA in three key case studies: the Clean Air Interstate Rule, the Clean Air Mercury Rule, and the Cooling Water Intake Structure Rule (Phase II). Each of the case studies is accompanied by critiques from both an opponent and a proponent of CBA and includes consideration of complementary analyses that could have been employed. The work's editors - two CBA supporters and one critic - conclude the report by offering concrete recommendations for improving the use of CBA, focusing on five areas: technical quality of the analyses, relevance to the agency decision-making process, transparency of the analyses, treatment of new scientific findings, and balance in both the analyses and associated processes, including the treatment of distributional consequences.
 

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.

Contents

Preface
Chapter 1 Controversies Surrounding Regulatory Impact Analysis
Chapter 2 The Clean Air Interstate Rule
Chapter 3 The Technocratic and Democratic Functions of the CAIR Regulatory Analysis
Advocacy Dressed Up as Policy Analysis
Chapter 5 The Clean Air Mercury Rule
Chapter 6 The Mathematics of Mercury
An Economists Perspective
Chapter 8 The Cooling Water Intake Structures Rule
What Does an Economist Want?
Chapter 10 Fish Tales
Chapter 11 What We Learned
Contributors
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2009)

Winston Harrington is a senior fellow at Resources for the Future. Lisa Heinzerling is a professor of law at Georgetown University Law Center. She is currently on a leave of absence, serving as senior climate policy counsel at the Environmental Protection Agency. Richard D. Morgenstern is a senior fellow at Resources for the Future.

Bibliographic information