This collection of essays by one of the country's leading property theorists revitalizes the liberal personality theory of property.
Departing from traditional libertarian and economic theories of property, Margaret Jane Radin argues that the law should take into account nonmonetary personal value attached to property—and that some things, such as bodily integrity, are so personal they should not be considered property at all. Gathered here are pieces ranging from Radin's classic early essay on property and personhood to her recent works on governmental "taking" of private property.
Margaret Jane Radin is professor of law at Stanford University. She is the author of over twenty-five articles on legal and political theory.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
THREE Problems for the Theory of Absolute
FIVE Diagnosing the Takings Problem
Other editions - View all
adverse possession alienation appropriate argue argument aspect claim classical liberal common law compensation conception of property consider constitutional context corrective justice Court dichotomy distinction easement economic economic rents eminent domain entitlements Epstein erty essay example external Fourth Amendment Frank Michelman freedom fungible property government action Hegel Hobbesian hold holder housing human ideal ideology inalienable individual Justice Scalia justified kind land landlords liberal conception libertarian liberty Lockean market value Marx means ment Michelman moral Nollan normative Nozick object one's owner perhaps personal property personhood perspective political pragmatic private property problem prop property for personhood property regime property rights property theory protection reason recognize regulation relationship rent control rent-seeking residential rhetoric Richard Epstein Rule of Law seems sense servitudes simply social substantive due process supra note takings issue tenants theory of property things tion traditional treated understanding utilitarian wealth wrong