Reporting on the Courts: How the Mass Media Cover Judicial Actions
This text offers perspectives on media coverage of the courts. How accurate and unbiased is television and newspaper coverage of legal issues? The author looks at economics, the influence of ratings, and how accuracy is sometimes lost amid the often conflicting values of these two institues. He also examines the biases of both the courts and the press.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Construction of Judicial and Journalistic Authority
4 other sections not shown
accuracy and objectivity accurate adjudication angle biases appellate courts appointments attentive attorneys audiences authority challenge chapter cial citizens civil litigation Clarence Thomas commercial biases confirmation conflict context court coverage court reporters cover coverage of civil crime control criminal courts criminal justice criminal trials critical Davis Decisions and Images defendants Denniston dramatic Drechsel due process example expect formal hype hypothesis Ibid ideals Inside-Out Perspective insiders issues journalism journalists Judge Bork judicial selection jural Justice Scalia lawyers less Liebeck mainstream standards mass media mission morselized news-worth newspapers newsworthy nominees noncoverage norms Number O. J. Simpson official opinions oral arguments ordinary outputs Outside-In Perspective Paletz and Entman personalized plea plea bargaining political prosecutors readers and viewers reporters and editors result Review routine rules seldom Senate Simpson source-ery sources strategic imagery symbiosis television tend tions Tonya Harding Trial Courts U. S. Supreme Court usually watchdog York