讀者評論 - 撰寫評論
其他版本 - 查看全部
acres action aforesaid agent agreed agreement alleged amount appear application appointed authority averment Bank behalf Board carried cause charged child claim colony consent contained contended contract conviction costs Council Court Crown damage dated declaration deed defendant directed District effect entered entitled evidence executed exercise existence express fact false feloniously fraud give given Governor granted ground held indictment intention interest issue Johnston Judge judgment jury Justice lease leave license manager matter meaning mentioned natural necessary negligence objection opinion parties payment person plaintiff plea pleaded possession PRENDERGAST present prisoner proved Province provisions Queen question railway Rangiora reason received REGINA representations Resident Magistrate respect respondent road rule signed Statute stream sufficient Supreme Court taken trial trustees verdict Waste Lands whole Zealand
第 226 頁 - In every indictment for wilful and corrupt perjury it shall be sufficient to set forth the substance of the offence charged. upon the defendant, and by what court, or before whom, the oath was taken, (averring such court or person to have competent authority to administer the same...
第 226 頁 - ... assigned, without setting forth the bill, answer, information, indictment, declaration, or any part of any record or proceeding, either in law or equity, or any affidavit, deposition, or certificate, other than as hereinbefore stated, and without setting forth the commission or authority of the court or person before whom the perjury was committed.
第 337 頁 - Court may make an order vesting the right to transfer or call for a transfer of stock...
第 108 頁 - That for the sure and true interpretation of all statutes in general (be they penal or beneficial, restrictive or enlarging of the common law), four things are to be discerned and considered. 1. What was the common law before the making of the act? 2. What was the mischief and defect for which the common law did not provide? 3. What remedy the Parliament hath resolved and appointed to cure the disease of the commonwealth? And 4. The true reason of the remedy?
第 106 頁 - If the words of the statute are in themselves precise and unambiguous, then no more can be necessary than to expound those words in their natural and ordinary sense. The words themselves alone do in such case best declare the intention of the lawgiver.
第 42 頁 - I give, devise and bequeath all the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, both real and personal, to my beloved wife, Susie E. Smith, to have and to hold to her, my said wife, and to her heirs and assigns forever.
第 229 頁 - ... on the 25th day of March, the 24th day of June, the 29th day of September, and the 25th day of December, in each and every year, by even and equal portions.
第 108 頁 - The true reason of the remedy; and then the office of all the Judges is always to make such construction as shall suppress the mischief, and advance the remedy, and to suppress subtle inventions and evasions for continuance of the mischief, and pro privato commodo, and to add force and life to the cure and remedy, according to the true intent of the makers of the Act, pro bonopublico.
第 30 頁 - I apprehend it to be the rule of law, that if persons take upon themselves to make assertions as to which they are ignorant whether they are true or untrue, they must, in a civil point of view, be held as responsible as if they had asserted that which they knew to be untrue.