Reports of Judicial Decisions in the Constitutional Court, of the State of South-Carolina: Held at Charleston and Columbia, During the Years 1812, 13, 14, 15, and 16. To which is Added, Two Cases Determined in the Court of Equity in the Year Eighteen Hundred & Twenty-two, Volume 2
W.R.H. Treadway, 1823 - Law reports, digests, etc - 972 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action administrator admitted allowed appears authority bank bill bond charged CHARLES Charleston circumstances City claim clause coin COLUMBIA commission common concurred considered constitution construction contended contract counterfeit court death debt decision decree deed defendant demand dollars election entitled equity established et al evidence execution fact give given granted ground Haskell held Hogg indictment interest issue John judge judgment jurisdiction jury Justices knowing land Major March marriage means ment months motion necessary never notice objection offence opinion paid parties passed payment person plaintiff plea possession present principle proved provision punishment purchaser question reason received recorded recover refused Reports respect rule settled settlement statute sufficient taken Term Thompson tion trial trustees United verdict void volumes wife witness
Page 801 - Had the Constitution been silent on this head, there can be no doubt that all the particular powers requisite as means of executing the general powers would have resulted to the government by unavoidable implication. No axiom is more clearly established in law, or in reason, than that wherever the end is required the means are authorized; wherever a general power to do a thing is given, every particular power necessary for doing it is included.
Page 802 - State sovereignty would only exist in three cases: where the Constitution in express terms granted an exclusive authority to the Union; where it granted in one instance an authority to the Union, and in another prohibited the States from exercising the like authority; and where it granted an authority to the Union, to which a similar authority in the States would be absolutely and totally contradictory and repugnant.
Page 649 - A WRIT of quo warranto is in the nature of a writ of right for the king, against him who claims or usurps any office, franchise, or liberty, to inquire by what authority he supports his claim, in order to determine the right r.
Page 654 - ... 2. The common law has reserved to itself the exposition of all such acts of parliament as concern either the extent of these courts, or the matters depending before them. And therefore, if these courts either refuse to allow these acts of parliament, or will expound them in any other sense than what the common law puts upon them, the king's courts at Westminster will grant prohibitions to restrain and control them.
Page 660 - Judges of the Supreme Court and the Presidents of the Courts of Common Pleas, shall at stated times, receive for their services an adequate compensation, to be fixed by law, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office; but they shall receive no fees or perquisites of office, nor hold any other office of profit or trust under the authority of this state or the United States.
Page 591 - A warranty is a covenant real annexed to lands or tenements, whereby a man and his heirs are bound to warrant the same; and, either upon voucher, or by judgment in a writ of warrantia chartce, to yield other lands and tenements (which, in old books, is called in excambio), to the value of those that shall be evicted by a former title, or else may be used by way of rebutter.
Page 486 - IDE, of the said District, hath deposited in this office, the title of a book, the right whereof he claims as proprietor, in the words following, to wit : " Inductive Grammar, designed for beginners. By an Instructer." In conformity to the act of the Congress of the United States...
Page 780 - But as the plan of the Convention aims only at a partial union or consolidation, the State governments would clearly retain all the rights of sovereignty which they before had, and which were not, by that act, exclusively delegated to the United States.
Page 714 - Their judgment, however, shall not extend further than removal from office, disqualification to hold or enjoy any place of honor, trust or profit under this state; but the party so convicted shall, nevertheless, be liable to indictment, trial, judgment, and punishment, according to the laws of the land.