Republic of Slovenia: Financial System Stability Assessment
International Monetary Fund. European Dept.;International Monetary Fund. Monetary and Capital Markets Department
International Monetary Fund, Dec 6, 2012 - Business & Economics - 54 pages
The Slovenian financial system has been hard hit by the crisis. Banks remained highly vulnerable to continued credit deterioration and refinancing risks. Strengthening of financial condition of banks should be the short-term priority. The financial restructuring should be followed by privatization of state-controlled banks. The supervision of financial institutions should be complemented with a macroprudential overview geared toward overall stability of the financial system. The crisis preparedness and management framework should be improved, and risks to systemic financial stability should be identified.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
AML/CFT assessment ATVP authorities Bank of Slovenia banking system Basel II bottom-up tests capital adequacy Capital shortfall CAR shortfall concentration risk Core I'rer Core Tier corporate sector crisis management Data decline deleveraging domestic banks CAR double-dip adverse scenario downgrade Euribor Euro area financial stability ﬁnancing foreign banks fresh capital injections FSAP growth I'rer 1 shortfall impact impaired assets implementation income institutions insurance companies insurance sector internal l'rer 1 ratio Large domestic banks largest banks liabilities Liquidity Risk Loan losses Macroeconomic macroprudential oversight market share Monetary money laundering MONEYVAL monitoring ned banks nominal terms non-bank non-life off-site supervision operating percent of GDP proﬁtable provisions prudential real estate prices recapitalization reﬂecting restructuring result risk assumed Scenario analysis securities market shock 2011 shock Slovenian banks Solvency II sovereign bond staff state-controlled banks strengthened stress tests supervisory architecture supervisory frameworks systemic risk Tier 1 capital top-down