Robert Durall, petitioner v. Kenneth Quinn, respondent, on petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit: petition for a writ of certiorari, Issue 8; Issue 1255
Robert Durall, Thomas C. Goldstein, Pamela S. Karlan, Jeffrey L. Fisher, Amy Howe, Kevin K. Russell, United States. Supreme Court, Stanford University. Supreme Court Litigation Clinic
Wilson-Epes Printing, 2009 - Law - 60 pages
Argues that the Supreme Court's decision in Blakely v. Washington did not create a new rule of criminal procedure.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
9th Cir acting chief judge aggravated sentences apply retroactively Apprendi Ariz attorney-client privilege Blakely announced Blakely rule Booker Carolyn's body certiorari in Burton Commissioner Confrontation Clause constitutional conviction became final Court adopts Court held Court of Appeals Court's decision crime criminal procedure decision in Blakely defendant denied review direct review dissenting district court due process Durall argues Durall fails Durall's claims emphasis added evidentiary hearing exceptional sentence facts Fourteenth Amendment guilty verdict habeas corpus hold that Blakely imposing issue jurors jury's Justice last reasoned decision N.D. Cal Ninth Circuit P.I. evidence personal restraint petition petitioner plea agreement police to Carolyn's prisoners punishment question presented reasonable doubt standard Retroactively Continues Robert Durall rule of criminal Schardt Schriro sealed verdict sentence became final sentencing laws sentencing systems Sixth Amendment right statutory maximum Strickland Teague United unreasonable violate the Sixth Washington Court Washington Supreme Court WRIT OF CERTIORARI