Same-Sex Marriage and the Constitution
Does the Constitution protect the right to same-sex marriage? Taking a careful look at the issue, Evan Gerstmann looks at the legal debate, and asks whether, in a democratic society, the courts, rather than voters, should resolve the question. Gerstmann also asks whether such a court-created law could be effective in the face of public opposition. Evan Gerstmann argues that this problem is one of the most significant constitutional issues facing society because it challenges society's commitment to true legal equality. After graduating with honors from the University of Michigan Law school in 1986, Evan Gerstmann practiced law in New York City for five years. Subsequently, he completed his Masters and Ph.D. in Political Science at the University of Wisconsin. He studies the interaction between law and politics. He has published a book on constitutional law, The Constitutional Class: Gays, Lesbians and the Failure of Class-Based Equal Protection (University of Chicago, 1999), as well as articles on subjects ranging from freedom of speech to how criminal law affects victims of domestic violence.
What people are saying - Write a review
Same sex marriage and the ConstitutionUser Review - Not Available - Book Verdict
In this provocative legal study, Gertsmann drills deep into the gay marriage debate, beyond the well-mined rhetoric of"gay rights," to focus on the true bedrock of Americans' freedom: the Constitution ... Read full review
Reason and Prejudice Is the Heterosexual Monopoly on Marriage Rational?
Looking for Stricter Scrutiny Sexism Heterosexism and ClassBased Equal Protection
Marriage as a Fundamental Constitutional Right
The Fundamental Right to Marry
SameSex Marriage and the Fundamental Right to Marry
Rights and Equality
Should Courts Create New Rights?
Other editions - View all
abortion advocates of same-sex American apply approach argue argument Baehr basis Bill of Rights Bork child cited Civil Unions constitutional protection constitutional right Constitutional Underclass debate decision defined democratic denied divorce doctrine due process clause endorsement equal protection clause Eskridge federal Fourteenth Amendment framers free speech freedom of speech fundamental rights gay rights gays and lesbians gender discrimination Gerstmann held heterosexual homosexual Ibid incest interracial marriage issue judges jurisprudence justices Koppelman Law Review legal equality legal principles legislation legislature liberty Loving majority marital moral neutral parents person plural marriage political polygamy problem procreation prohibited question race racial raise children rational reason relationship reproductive requires riage right to marry role same-sex couples same-sex mar same-sex marriage ban segregation sex marriage sexual social society sodomy statute strict scrutiny substantive due process Sunstein Supreme Court theory tion Tushnet Vermont Virginia vote Wardle Warren Court Whittington women Zablocki