Scientific Essentialism defends the view that the fundamental laws of nature depend on the essential properties of the things on which they are said to operate, and are therefore not independent of them. These laws are not imposed upon the world by God, the forces of nature, or anything else, but rather are immanent in the world. Ellis argues that ours is a dynamic world consisting of more or less transient objects which are constantly interacting with each other, and whose identities depend on their roles in these processes. The laws of nature are metaphysically necessary, and consequently, there are necessary connections between events.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
analytic proposition argued argument atom basic Bigelow and Pargetter categorical properties causal laws causal powers causal processes chemical circumstances concept contingent describe disposed to behave dispositional properties distinction economic electromagnetic electrons epistemically possible erties essential natures essential properties essentialist theory example exist explain global heat engine Hence hierarchies Hume world Humean hydrogen ideal identity infimic species instances instantiated interactions intrinsic properties kind of world kinds of objects kinds of processes kinds of things laws of nature Lierse logical mass metaphysically necessary molecules natural kinds natural kmds natural necessity natural properties necessarily neoclassical economics nomic occur ontologically dependent particles perfect competition philosophers physical plausible possible worlds predicates problem problem of induction prop propensities properties and relations properties and structures properties or structures proposition quantities real essences realism reality reason scientific essentialism scientific essentialist scientific realism substances Supervenience supposed theory of laws thesis tion tropes true truth