Telling people about research is just as important as doing it. But many researchers, who, in all other respects, are competent scientists, are afraid of writing. They are wary of the unwritten rules, the unspoken dogma and the inexplicably complex style, all of which seem to pervade conventional thinking about scientific writing.
This book has been written to expose these phantoms as largely smoke and mirrors, and replace them with principles that make communicating research easier and encourage researchers to write confidently. It presents a way of thinking about writing that emulates the way good scientists think about research.
It concentrates on the structure of articles, rather than simply on grammar and syntax. So, it is an ideal reference for researchers preparing articles for scientific journals, posters, conference presentations, reviews and popular articles; for students preparing theses; and for researchers whose first language is not English.
Scientific Writing = Thinking in Words expounds principles that produce scientific articles in a wide range of disciplines that are focused, concise and, best of all, easy to write and read. As one senior scientist observed, "This book not only made me a better writer; it made me a better scientist".
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
acceptable arguments audience authors beginning body mass index chance clear clearly colleague colostrum complete components conclusion creeps decide describe developed Discussion draft dullsville editing editors emphasise ensure example experiment experimental fact field fungus generalisations give graphs ideas impact impact factors important interest interpretation Introduction journal justify least Leukemia Inhibitory Factor listeners literature logical long-term memory Materials and Methods means methodology non-scientists noun numbers oral presentation paragraph piglets possible poster precise probably problem psychoceramics published readability reasoning recognise referees references relatively relevant Results section retrograde amnesia scientific article scientific journals scientific paper scientific writing scientists sentence short-term memory simple speaker specific Staphylococcus aureus statement statistical structure style subordinate clause Summary tables talk technique thesis things thinking treatment unifying hypothesis usually Vancouver system verb volupta whole written