Scott David Bowen, petitioner v. State of Oregon, respondent, on petition for a writ of certiorari to the Oregon Court of Appeals: reply brief for the petitioners
Scott David Bowen, Pamela S. Karlan, Jeffrey L. Fisher, Amy Howe, Kevin K. Russell, United States. Supreme Court, Stanford University. Supreme Court Litigation Clinic
Wilson-Epes Printing, 2009 - Law - 10 pages
Urges the Supreme Court to grant certiorari in order to determine whether a jury can convict a defendant of a felony based on a less than unanimous jury verdict.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
1320 Capitol St 20814 Peter Gartlan 3d Cir 559 Nathan Abbott 9th Cir Abbott Way Stanford Amendment's unanimity require Amicus Amy Howe Kevin Andres Apodaca plurality Bethesda Cert Chief Defender Counsel Chief Deputy Defender cites Clinic 559 Nathan Court Litigation Clinic Creative Leather Products D.C. Cir defense of Apodaca Defense Services 1320 Deputy Defender Office Empirical Research Fisher Pamela formalistic Fourteenth Amendment Gartlan Chief Defender guilty verdicts Hernandez-Garcia Hung Juries James Chief Deputy jury trial jury verdict Law School Supreme Leegin Creative Leather Litigation Clinic 559 N.E. Suite non-unanimity schemes Oregon and Louisiana particular voting tally Peter Gartlan Chief PSKS reasonable doubt Record Bronson requires a unanimous Research in Deliberating Russell Sarihifard School Supreme Court Services 1320 Capitol Seventh Amendment Sixth Amendment Sixth Amendment's unanimity Stanford Law School STARE DECISIS ARGUMENT STATE'S STARE DECISIS Suite 200 Salem tally to render U.S. Const unanimity regimes unanimous verdict United Writ of Certiorari